How to Read the Gospel of John / David Ford
For the Life of the World / Yale Center for Faith & CultureShow Notes
The Gospel of John is a gospel of superabundance. The cosmic Christ made incarnate would of course yield an absolute superabundance of grace, love, and unity.
What makes John’s Gospel so distinct from the Synoptics? Why does it continue to draw readers into inexhaustible depths of meaning? In this conversation, theologian David Ford reflects on his two-decade journey writing a commentary on John. Together with Drew Collins, he explores John’s unique blend of theology, history, and literary artistry, describing it as a “gospel of superabundance” that continually invites readers to trust, to reread, and to enter into deeper life with Christ. Together they explore themes of individuality and community; friendship and love; truth, reconciliation, and unity; the tandem vision of Jesus as both cosmic and intimate; Jesus’s climactic prayer for unity in chapter 17. And ultimately the astonishing superabundance available in the person of Christ. Along the way, Ford reflects on his interfaith reading practices, his theological friendships, and the vital role of truth and love for Christian witness today.
“There’s always more in John’s gospel … these big images of light and life in all its abundance.”
This episode was made possible in part by the generous support of the Tyndale House Foundation. Visit tyndale.foundation to learn more.
Episode Highlights
“It is a gospel for beginners. But also it’s endlessly rich, endlessly deep.” “There’s always more in John’s gospel and he has these big images of light and, life in all its abundance.” “It all culminates in love. Father, I desire that those also you, whom you have given me, may be with me.” “On the cross, evil, suffering, sin, death happened to Jesus. But Jesus happens to evil, suffering, sin, death.” “We have to go deeper into God and Jesus, deeper into community, and deeper into the world.”
Show Notes
David Ford on writing a commentary on John over two decades John’s Gospel compared to the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) John as theological history writing (Rudolf Schnackenburg) John’s purpose statement in chapter 20: written so that you may trust “A gospel for beginners” with simple language and cosmic depth John as a gospel of superabundance: light, life, Spirit without measure John’s focus on individuals: Nicodemus, Samaritan woman, man born blind, Martha, Mary, Lazarus The Beloved Disciple and John’s communal authorship Friendship, love, and unity in the Farewell Discourses (John 13–17) John 17 as the most profound chapter in Scripture The crisis of rewriting: scrapping 15 years of writing to begin anew Scriptural reasoning with Jews, Muslims, and Christians on John’s Gospel Wrestling with John 8 and the polemics against “the Jews” Reconciliation across divisions John’s vision of discipleship: learning, loving, praying, and living truth
Helpful Links and Resources
David Ford, The Gospel of John: A Theological Commentary Rudolf Schnackenburg, The Gospel According to St. John
About David Ford
David F. Ford is Regius Professor of Divinity Emeritus at the University of Cambridge. He has written extensively on Christian theology, interfaith engagement, and scriptural reasoning. His most recent work is The Gospel of John: A Theological Commentary (Baker Academic, 2021). Ford is co-founder of the Cambridge Interfaith Programme and the Rose Castle Foundation.
Production Notes
This podcast featured David Ford Interview by Drew Collins Edited and Produced by Evan Rosa Hosted by Evan Rosa Production Assistance by Macie Bridge, Alexa Rollow, and Emily Brookfield A Production of the Yale Center for Faith & Culture at Yale Divinity School [https://faith.yale.edu/about](https://faith.yale.edu/about) Support For the Life of the World podcast by giving to the Yale Center for Faith & Culture: [https://faith.yale.edu/give](https://faith.yale.edu/give) This episode was made possible in part by the generous support of the Tyndale House Foundation. For more information visit Tyndale.
More from For the Life of the World / Yale Center for Faith & Culture
What happens when an ancient discipline built to remake the self in the context of a way of life and normative map gets sold back to us as lifehacking for stress relief and optimization?
It took Odysseus ten years to sail home from Troy to Ithaca; we can fly the same distance in about an hour. But faster travel hasn't brought us any closer to home. We can know more, do more, and connect more than ever, and yet our ability to belong to our own reality seems to be shrinking. Philosopher Ian Marcus Corbin, who teaches at Harvard Medical School and directs Harvard's Public Culture Project, takes up that paradox in his new book, To Arrive Where We Started: Belonging in the Modern World. The title comes from T.S. Eliot's Four Quartets, and Corbin reads Eliot's lines as something like a mission statement for humanity: the point of the journey is not to escape reality or optimize our way around it, but to truly belong to it.
Everything is “maxxed” right now, and the news cycle in particular seems to be historymaxxing, insisting that things have never been worse than they are now. And the threats are real, from AI and global warming to election integrity—foreign affairs gone wrong, and violence abroad, in our homes, and in our schools. But the news maxxes us on fear, and so do politicians and corporations, because they want us to do something. If theologian Lee C. Camp is right, history was already maxed at the incarnation, and it came through a subversive way of life: humble, compassionate, at times angry, but radical and scandalous all the same. Camp, author of *Scandalous Witness: A Little Political Manifesto for Christians* and founder and host of the nationally syndicated podcast and radio show No Small Endeavor, argues that the idolatry of the nation state, and even the effort to legislate Christian morality and values into a political movement, is a subversion of Christianity.
Human growth can seem to just happen—genes, care, and nurture set each of us on a trajectory across the lifespan. But how do people actually grow toward wholeness, and is virtue even the point?
Technology, Aaron Cline Hanbury suggests, is never a purely neutral tool. But the history of ethical thinking about technology shows that as long as there's been technology, there's been anxiety about it. Or perhaps more accurately, anxiety about what we might do with it. And increasingly, what it might do to us.