Show Notes
What happens when you stop treating litigation as a cost center—and start treating it like capital? In this episode of New Law Order, Joel Cohen and John Morley sit down with Chris Bogart, co-founder and CEO of Burford Capital, to unpack how legal finance emerged—and what it reveals about the structural limits of the modern law firm.
Bogart traces the origins of litigation finance to his time as a litigator at Cravath, Swaine & Moore and later as General Counsel of Time Warner, where constant pressure from CFOs exposed a deeper problem: dollars spent on litigation don’t just reduce earnings—they reduce enterprise value by multiples. In that light, litigation finance is about preserving balance-sheet value.
The conversation reframes litigation as a financial asset—one that can be underwritten, modeled, and monetized—while also explaining why traditional law-firm partnerships struggle to do this themselves. Bogart lays out how annual partner distributions, high partner mobility, and prohibitions on outside capital make Big Law structurally ill-suited to finance long-dated risk. He also explains how medieval doctrines like champerty lost their force, clearing the way for institutional capital to enter the space.
Finally, Bogart pulls back the curtain—carefully—on how Burford evaluates cases, and why litigation finance increasingly functions as a tool for risk management rather than speculation.
In this conversation: Litigation as Capital Allocation: Why legal spend can destroy multiples of market value—and how funding changes the equation Why Law Firms Can’t Be Banks: Partner mobility, annual distributions, and the cash-flow problem baked into Big Law Underwriting a Lawsuit: How Burford evaluates merits, economics, and collectability—and why most cases don’t qualify
Guest: Chris Bogart is the CEO and co-founder of Burford Capital, the world’s largest litigation finance firm. A former partner at Cravath and former General Counsel of Time Warner, he pioneered legal finance and helped bring it into the mainstream of global capital markets.
For more conversations with the figures reshaping the legal business, subscribe to New Law Order. For a CLE-eligible version of this interview and more legal analysis, visit www.talksonlaw.com. For questions or comments, email [email protected] .
More from New Law Order
Big Law has spent decades and a fortune on diversity, and the numbers barely moved at the partnership level. The usual explanation is that somewhere in the building (or somewhere in your head) there's racism and misogyny. David Wilkins, Harvard Law professor and possibly the most important scholar on the legal profession, has a less satisfying answer: you don't need bigots to get this result. You just need busy partners.
In this episode of New Law Order, Joel Cohen and Yale Law Professor John Morley speak with CJ Mahoney, Chief Legal Officer of Meta, about one of the hardest legal questions facing modern technology companies: when a product becomes deeply woven into daily life, how should the law think about harm, responsibility, and regulation? Drawing on a career that has taken him from Williams & Connolly to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, Microsoft, and now Meta, Mahoney offers an unusually candid look at what it means to serve as the top lawyer inside a company operating at the center of law, politics, and technological change.
Richard Sander, UCLA law professor and economist, has spent decades advancing one of the most controversial arguments in legal education: that large racial preferences in law school admissions may frequently harm the students they are intended to help. In this episode of New Law Order, Joel Cohen and Yale Law Professor John Morley speak with Sander about affirmative action, the Supreme Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, and what new data may reveal about the future of law school admissions.
Michael A. Gerstenzang, the longtime managing partner and now senior partner of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, explains how he positioned one of the world's most established law firms to lead in AI adoption — not by outsourcing innovation, but by building it from the inside. The conversation traces a series of structural bets that began before generative AI entered the mainstream, starting with ClearyX, a wholly owned technology subsidiary launched in 2021 to reinvent M&A due diligence. Gerstenzang describes the venture's founding provocation — imagine the business that puts Cleary Gottlieb out of business, and build it — and how A/B testing against traditional associate-led diligence demonstrated equal or superior quality at roughly half the cost.
This week, we’re sharing a timely episode from a related TalksOnLaw podcast, AI Lawyer. In this episode, host Joel Cohen is joined by Judge Paul Grimm for a conversation about one of the most unsettling problems facing the legal system: what happens when audio, video, and other forms of evidence can be generated, manipulated, or challenged by artificial intelligence?