Show Notes
No matter how simple a metric's name makes it sound, the details are often downright devilish. What is a website visit? What is revenue? What is a customer? Go one level deeper with a metric like customer acquisition cost (CAC) or customer lifetime value (CLV or LTV, depending on how you acronym), and things can get messy in a hurry. In some cases, there are multiple "right" definitions, depending on how the metric is being used. In some cases, there are incentive structures to thumb the definitional scale one way or another. In some cases, a hastily made choice becomes a well-established, yet misguided, norm. In some cases, public companies simply throw their hands up and stop reporting a key metric! Dan McCarthy, Associate Professor of Marketing at the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland, spends a lot of time and thought culling through public filings and disclosures therein trying to make sense of metric definitions, so he was a great guest to have to dig into the topic! For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.
More from The Analytics Power Hour
How do you know whether AI is actually making your organization better? Counting prompts, sessions, and token spend is easy. Figuring out whether any of that activity is driving business outcomes is...harder. Daniela Matinho, Marketing Science Senior Strategist at LinkedIn, wrote a Medium post on that very question, and it helped shape this discussion about what AI is (and isn't) changing about the work of the analyst. As Daniela pointed out, if you tell a client you did something in two days instead of a week because of AI, the client doesn't care. They care about the result! From the smart-but-junior agent that needs constant supervision, to the analyst's shift toward being more of a storyteller, to the unglamorous-but-essential work of data quality and governance, we covered a lot of ground. Being faster is great. Staying influential is better. This episode is brought to you, in part, by our sponsors, Stape and Prism from Ask-Y. For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page: https://analyticshour.io/2026/10/13/308-ai-changes-everything-analytical-fundamentals-still-apply/
There's a version of this episode where AI replaces the data visualization expert entirely, and there's a version where it's useless without one. Neither is quite right, according to Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic of Storytelling with Data, who joined Tim, Moe, and Julie to sort out where AI genuinely earns its keep in data storytelling and where it's just producing a shinier first draft of the same shitty slide. Cole-admittedly a skeptic-turned-convert who once joked she'd retire before having to deal with any of this-walks through why the humans who benefit most from AI are the ones who already have the foundation to know when to ignore it, why "let me look at some options" beats "give me the final chart" as a prompt, and why the analog, pencil-and-paper parts of the process might be the most valuable friction in the whole workflow. Bring your own opinions on whether Claude should ever be handed "the rules" and told to just go. This episode is brought to you, in part, by our sponsors, Prism from Ask-Y and Stape. For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page: https://analyticshour.io/2026/09/29/307-ai-does-and-does-not-work-for-data-storytelling/
Before there was BI, there were "decision support systems." Somewhere along the way, we seem to have quietly dropped the "decision support" part and just kept the systems. Zohar Strinka, founder of Analytics Strategies and creator of the Meta-Problem Method, joined us to put the point back where it belongs: if nothing is going to be done differently after the analysis, then the analysis had exactly zero effect on the world. But -- and this is the part that's easy to miss -- that does NOT mean marching up to a stakeholder and demanding, "What decision are you going to make?" People don't want a model that hands them the right answer. They want to understand and weigh the trade-offs themselves, which means good decision support looks a lot more like a really well-informed pro/con list than a score. We got into problem spaces, high-yield problems, the cost of being wrong in each direction, why "we have all this data, so the answer must be in here" is really just a person pulverizing a bag of rocks hoping for diamonds, and, ultimately, peanut butter. This episode is brought to you, in part, by our sponsors, Stape and Prism from Ask-Y. For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.
Stephen Follows has spent 15 years turning film-industry curiosity into a career — asking questions like how much movies really earn, why poster colors have shifted over decades, and whether old studio domains are still up for grabs. In this episode, he joined us to talk about building that unusual path, the cautionary tale of TheNumbers.com, and his theory about Sandra Bullock. Go start your passion project. This episode is brought to you, in part, by our sponsors, Prism from Ask-Y and Stape. For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.
Everyone's posting their AI projects online like proud pet owners sharing videos of their cat doing something marginally impressive — cute, occasionally clever, sometimes a little cringe. And the Analytics Power Hour is no different! In this co-hosts-only episode, Tim, Michael, and Julie skip the thought leadership hot takes and just… compare notes. What have they actually built? What broke? What surprised them? From a custom GPT podcast librarian to a full-blown show production app wired up to Neon, Vercel, Resend, and about five other things Michael is only sort of sure he set up correctly, to a Gemini Gem that simulates a client interaction so realistically it raises your blood pressure in a safe environment — there's a lot of ground covered. Plus: why AI-generated communication has a Stevia aftertaste, why deploying AI context across a team is way harder than it looks, and why the LLM will absolutely tell you what you want to hear about your Meta spend if you give it half a chance. This episode is brought to you, in part, by our sponsors, Stape and Prism from Ask-Y. For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.