Show Notes
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Watts v. U.S.
At a protest, a young man made a statement about getting the president in the sights of his rifle, and was convicted of threatening the life of the president. Was he, though?
The question before the court: Was his statement actually a threat? Was it prohibited by the law?
More from Relitigated
In the season 2 finale we re-argue the Supreme Court case McCleskey v. Kemp.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier.
In this special episode we bring you the first ever edition of Objection! The Relitigated Game Show.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Griggs v. Duke Power Company.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Berghuis v. Thompkins.