Show Notes
Once a professional gets to the age of 60, they often hit an inflection point, personally and professionally. Here, a former big four auditor and recruiter turned coach unpacks how and why this happens and what older legal practitioners need to do to ensure they can continue to flourish, in whatever form that takes.
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, host Jerome Doraisamy speaks with Sean Spence & Associates director Sean Spence about his work with lawyers, what happens to lawyers once they hit their 60s, the impact of the billable hour upon individuals, the extent to which being locked into one's identity as a lawyer influences their direction, the "positive corollary to these negatives", practical steps that older lawyers can take if they hit this inflection point and the questions they should ask of themselves, and what younger lawyers can and should do in anticipation of reaching this vocational juncture. If you like this episode, show your support by rating us or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts (The Lawyers Weekly Show) and by following Lawyers Weekly on social media: Facebook, X and LinkedIn. If you have any questions about what you heard today, any topics of interest you have in mind, or if you'd like to lend your voice to the show, email [email protected]
More from Lawyers Weekly Podcast Network
Good decision making in law is not always about thinking harder. For junior lawyers, knowing when to keep researching, when to trust their judgement and when to make the call is a critical skill that takes time and experience to develop. Here, we explore the difference between quick, pressure and big decisions, and how lawyers can learn to make better judgement calls. In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, host Jerome Doraisamy speaks with Elit Lawyers by McGirr & Snell managing partner Danielle Snell about why decision making is a skill that is not always taught in law school, how junior lawyers can recognise when they have enough information to act, and why experienced practitioners can often reach conclusions far more quickly. They discuss navigating pressure and artificial urgency, knowing when further research adds value and when it simply delays an inevitable decision, the role of supervision in developing professional judgement, and how AI can be used to test and challenge legal thinking without replacing the critical reasoning skills lawyers need to build. If you like this episode, show your support by rating us or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts (The Lawyers Weekly Show) and by following Lawyers Weekly on social media: Facebook, X and LinkedIn. If you have any questions about what you heard today, any topics of interest you have in mind, or if you'd like to lend your voice to the show, email [email protected]
In this special episode of LawTech Talks, produced in partnership with iManage, two representatives from Sydney-based firm Swaab reflect on their impressions of iManage's next-gen platform and generative AI solution, Ask iManage, focusing on what they've learnt and ensuring best practice moving forward.
As one expert puts it, product counsel are "Swiss army knives, who can issue, spot, and identify the different legal risks that may come" when bringing products to market. Here, we unpack the growing prevalence of such a role and what it means more broadly for in-house legal functions.
It's Cyber Security Awareness Month! In this special episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, produced in partnership with InfoTrack, we unpack how much the risk and compliance landscape is shifting and why having humans in the decision-making process is so essential in protecting the integrity of a law firm.
True-crime podcasts and online speculation are increasingly shaping public perceptions of criminal cases before they reach trial, raising important questions about the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair hearing.