Show Notes
In this episode of The Spectrum, recorded on March 27, 2026, we dive into the controversial and deeply personal decision behind voting on Virginia’s out-of-cycle redistricting. Host Linda explains why, despite a lifelong opposition to gerrymandering, she chose to vote "yes" on a partisan redistricting measure.
Explore the reasoning behind "fighting fire with fire" to counter national power grabs and protect the rights of marginalized communities. We discuss the potential impacts of this vote on LGBTQ rights, reproductive autonomy, and healthcare costs, as well as the national stakes of the 2026 midterms. Join the conversation on whether it's ever right to go against your principles to prevent a greater harm.
00:00 – Introduction: Episode 38 and the Redistricting Vote 00:54 – Why I Voted Against My Principles 01:26 – The Unconstitutionality of Gerrymandering 02:16 – Trump’s 2025 Call for National Redistricting 02:53 – Fighting Fire with Fire: The Need to Fight Back 04:05 – A Choice for Voters: Virginia vs. Texas 05:16 – Do Our Representatives Actually Represent Us? 06:02 – The National Impact on the LGBTQ Community 07:01 – Reproductive Rights, Healthcare, and Self-Interest 08:18 – Conclusion: Join the Discussion
Transcript: https://spectrumpodcast.org/2026/03/27/why-i-voted-yes-for-a-gerrymander-in-virginia/
More from The Spectrum
Why does Virginia’s Question 2 matter to my marriage? My wife Lauri and I voted “yes” on Question 2, the proposed amendment to the Virginia Constitution that would remove the state’s existing constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and require Virginia to recognize and treat all legally valid marriages equally, regardless of sex, gender, or race. Same-sex marriage is currently protected by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision. But Virginia’s Constitution still contains the language adopted in 2006 that says only a union between a man and a woman may be recognized as a marriage. I don't know what would happen to existing same-sex marriages if Obergefell were ever overturned. That's precisely why I think removing that language from Virginia's Constitution matters. And Question 2 isn't only about same-sex marriage. It would also protect marriage regardless of race, bringing to mind Virginia's history with Loving v. Virginia. If you live in Virginia, Question 2 is on the 2026 ballot. Here's why it matters to me—and to my marriage. You can find the transcript at https://spectrumpodcast.org/2026/09/30/why-question-2-matters-to-my-marriage/ 00:00 Early Voting Has Begun 00:22 What Is Question 2? 00:49 Why Question 2 Matters to My Marriage 01:03 The Risk If Obergefell Is Overturned 01:55 Why That Risk Isn't Hypothetical 02:22 Explicitly Protecting Our Marriages 02:29 Question 2 Protects More Than Same-Sex Marriage 02:37 Loving v. Virginia and Marriage Equality 03:05 What Question 2 Would Protect 03:14 Why I'm Asking You to Vote Yes 03:28 The American Ideal Behind Question 2
What does it mean to be non-binary when you don’t feel like either a man or a woman?
The episode explores the history and significance of pronouns in the English language, the challenges of gendered pronouns, the emergence of non-binary pronouns, and the importance of respecting and using correct pronouns for individuals. It emphasizes the impact of pronouns on emotional well-being and the need for acceptance and validation.
What does an LGBTQ community center actually do?