Show Notes
I’m thrilled to share the latest episode of the Thriving Leaders Podcast, featuring an insightful conversation with Claire de Carteret, Managing Director of Gallup APAC. If you’ve ever wondered what truly drives high performance in teams, this episode is a must-listen.
Gallup is renowned for its global research on engagement, wellbeing, and leadership. Claire brings the data to life with real-world strategies that leaders can apply immediately. We talk about the 12 conditions required for high performance, how to shift away from outdated hierarchies, and why "having a best friend at work" is more than just a feel-good phrase.
In this episode, we cover: (00:00) - Introduction (03:07) – Engagement = Performance Why engagement matters more than motivation. (06:19) – 12 elements of high-performing teams. (10:22) – Why does work need a reframe. (15:31) – One meaningful check-in change everything. (17:46) – What People Need from Leaders (18:48) – Strengths at Work using strengths daily boosts engagement. (23:53) – A powerful team trust-building exercise. (29:13) – Why connection drives safety and performance. (32:52) – Intentional conversations build trust. (38:17) – Leveraging Strengths using differences as advantages. (50:03) – Final Thoughts
One of my favourite takeaways? Claire’s simple but powerful strategy: One meaningful conversation a week. That alone can shift the dynamic of your team.
If you're committed to building a thriving team culture, this episode will give you fresh ideas and evidence-based frameworks to do just that. I’d love to hear what resonates with you.
Where to get the book, Thriving Leaders: Learn the Skills to Lead Confidently:
Physical: Purchase here International: Amazon Booktopia Barnes & Noble Audio: Audible Spotify
For all other resources: – Learn more about our leadership programs – Join our fortnightly newsletter – Want to connect directly with Claire? [email protected] – Follow on LinkedIn – Visit: www.thrivingculture.com.au
More from Thriving Leaders Podcast
How do you keep a team aligned when the plan keeps changing?
The strategy meeting ends and everyone appears to agree. Then the real conversation begins elsewhere. I’ve seen this happen in leadership teams, and it leaves me wondering: what made it difficult to say those things in the room?
Can you be kind to your people and still hold them accountable?
When two priorities both matter, why do leaders feel such pressure to choose one? The day-to-day work needs attention, but so does the future. A team needs room to act, but it also needs direction.
What separates a meaningful team conversation from another meeting where people simply exchange information?