Show Notes
Fraudsters no longer need to reinvent their tactics from scratch. With artificial intelligence and increasingly sophisticated access to consumer data, they can test new approaches quickly, learn what works, and adapt before financial institutions have time to catch up.
That speed is forcing banks and other financial institutions to rethink how they authenticate customers. One approach gaining traction is ownership authentication, a process that looks beyond whether an application’s information matches a particular account. During a PaymentsJournal Podcast, John Gordon, CEO of ValidiFi, and Suzanne Sando, Lead Analyst of Fraud Management at Javelin Strategy & Research, explored how this approach can help financial institutions connect seemingly minor signals, identify emerging risks, and stay ahead of the adaptive fraud schemes.
A New Generation of Fraud
Artificial intelligence has made it possible for criminals to create new schemes and fraudulent identities in a matter of minutes. AI has fueled the rise of several types of scams, including account takeovers and bank impersonation. Some fraudsters use AI to submit account applications across multiple institutions, while others use it to gather information about existing customers, allowing them to mimic typical behavior and evade detection.
One way financial institutions are responding to those evolving threats is through ownership authentication. Rather than focusing solely on a new account or one that appears to be involved in fraud, this approach seeks to understand the consumer across their broader financial relationships. It incorporates factors such as ownership, payment history, account stability, and behavioral changes that can reveal emerging risk.
Verified accounts generally outperform better than the broader population in terms of fraud outcomes, but those results can improve further when institutions add an additional layer of authentication. Simply verifying that account details match the person opening the account is no longer enough.
“Just because an account is open and valid and it belongs to a particular consumer, there are still aspects that drive different decisions for the financial services provider based on fraud and risk connotations,” said Gordon. “If an account is open, valid and belongs to the applicant, if that applicant has an email address that’s less than 30 days old, the increase in risk is skyrocketing.”
Taking the Holistic View
It’s no longer enough to examine a single aspect of a consumer’s identity or behavior. Matching personally identifiable information (PII) to an account at a single point in time doesn’t provide a complete picture. Financial institutions increasingly need to take a holistic view of the consumer and assess whether the information provided remains consistent over time.
“Taken individually, you may miss the signals of a brand new email address or phone number—all these things that maybe don’t seem that that risky on the surface,” said Sando. “When you put them all together, it becomes a serious risk factor for this particular consumer. Fraudsters are bypassing a lot of checks that they normally wouldn’t have in the past because they have AI enabling them.”
Fraudsters, for example, may begin an account takeover with seemingly innocuous changes, such as updating a marital status or utility information. On their own, these changes may not raise an alarm.
Over time, however, those changes can be combined with a new credit card, a new debit card, and a utility bill to make the activity appear legitimate. Individually, each signal may seem insignificant. Together, they can reveal a much stronger pattern of potential fraud—one that can be missed when institutions examine each signal in isolation.
Facing Up to First-Party Fraud
Ownership authentication can also play a role in addressing fraud associated with buy now, pay later plans. As these options have become a prominent part of the consumer economy, they have made i
More from PaymentsJournal
For years, payments have largely fallen into two camps: horizontal platforms built to serve a broad range of businesses, and vertical solutions designed around the specific needs of a particular industry.
The more banking moves onto a smartphone, the harder it becomes for financial institutions to create a tangible connection with their customers. Yet as more of the banking relationship becomes digital, consumers continue to seek experiences that feel personal and distinctive—from personalized products and luxury brands to rewards, upgrades, and exclusive access.
The payment card was supposed to disappear. As digital wallets, embedded payments, and mobile-first experiences reshaped commerce, the physical card seemed destined to follow the path of other outdated tools. Instead, it has found a new role—not just as a simple way to pay, but as a platform of identity, access, rewards, and deeper customer engagement.
There is a growing disparity between hype and reality when it comes to agentic commerce. This is not so much a critique of AI agents’ capabilities, or the infrastructure that has rapidly emerged to support them, as it is an indication that this model is still in its early stages.
Most businesses have no shortage of customer data. They know who their customers are, how they pay, when they tend to pay and, in many cases, exactly when a payment goes wrong. The harder question is what to do with all that information—particularly when a customer falls behind.