#80 Family Law Protection of Trusts: Bernard, Coley & Danae, and Dovgan
The Art of Estate Planning PodcastShow Notes
In this third instalment of our series on discretionary trusts and family law, I discuss the decisions of Bernard & Bernard, Coley v Danae, and Dovgan & Dovgan
These cases look at how testamentary trusts will be treated by the family courts, the effectiveness of joint controllers, and whether trusts controlled by a Respondent's parents can be drawn into their family law proceedings as property of the parties.
Read the decisions here:
Bernard & Bernard [2019] FamCA 421
Coley v Danae [2020] WASCA 13
Dovgan & Dovgan [2021] FamCA 306
More from The Art of Estate Planning Podcast
Ever walked out of a client meeting and suddenly thought… “Oh no. I forgot to ask them THAT?”
Ever had a client ask for a “bloodline trust”, “protective trust” or some other impressively named structure and quietly wondered whether you’ve missed an entire area of trust law?
Did the Federal Court just reheat Richstar 20 years later?
Capital reserved testamentary trusts sound like the perfect compromise: let a spouse benefit from the income while preserving the underlying inheritance for the bloodline.
When a relationship breaks down, the family law issues understandably take centre stage.