'Not Giving in to No One' & 'Pilfering a Pooch' & 'Melting a Guy's Heart'
The People’s Court PodcastShow Notes
First, the plaintiff rented an apartment from the defendant, but she moved out because she thought the defendant was annoying. The defendant won’t return her security deposit, so she’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff’s apartment was a mess, so she doesn’t owe. She’s countersuing for damages and pain and suffering.
Then, the plaintiff hired the defendant to watch his dog. He claims the defendant gave the dog to someone else without his permission, and now that person won’t give his dog back. He’s suing for the cost of the dog and pain and suffering. The defendant says the plaintiff gave the dog away. She’s countersuing for pain and suffering.
Plus, the plaintiff pawned some items at the defendant’s shop. When he went to go pick them up, the defendant told him they melted the items down, so he’s suing. The defendant argues the plaintiff was late on his payments, so it’s the plaintiff’s fault.
Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
More from The People’s Court Podcast
First, the plaintiff says the defendant, her ex-boyfriend, owes her money for activities and trips she paid for during their relationship. She is suing to be reimbursed. The defendant claims the only reason she is suing is because he broke up with her.
First, the plaintiff says he and the defendant were friends, and that one day the defendant came to him in desperate need of money. He claims the defendant never repaid the loan and has left him struggling to afford food. He is suing for the amount owed. The defendant says he repaid everything and alleges the plaintiff is a hothead who once bashed his own head into a brick wall and fled as police arrived. He is countersuing for pain and suffering.
First, the plaintiff says the defendant let go of a shopping cart in a supermarket parking lot, and it hit his new car, causing extensive damage. When he confronted the defendant, he allegedly drove off. The plaintiff is suing for repair costs. The defendant claims the plaintiff’s wife caused the damage by squeezing her cart between parked cars. He believes the plaintiff is pinning the blame on him to avoid paying for his own repairs.
First, the plaintiff hired the defendant to help him find women to date, but the defendant didn't find any viable mates, so the plaintiff is suing for a refund. The defendant insists he sent him on a date with a great woman, but he just changed his mind about her services for no reason. Besides, the defendant doesn't provide refunds.
First, the plaintiff claims her ex-girlfriend borrowed money from her for a car when they were still together. After their breakup, the defendant refused to give back the money, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant insists the reason she needed a car in the first place is because the plaintiff ruined hers.