Show Notes
In this episode, Ben Felix and Braden Warwick unpack the surprisingly complex world of expected return modeling and why it matters so much for retirement projections, portfolio construction, and financial advice. They explain how PWL Capital currently estimates expected returns across asset classes, why traditional Monte Carlo methods relying on Gaussian distributions may miss important market behaviors, and how new research could improve the realism of long-term financial planning simulations. The conversation also explores a fascinating collaboration between PWL and Columbia Engineering student John Yang, who worked with Professor Michael Robbins on a project to build more realistic synthetic return data for financial planning. John explains how his team used empirical distributions, t-copulas, and Extreme Value Theory to better capture market crashes, fat tails, and asset co-movements during periods of stress. Ben and Braden then analyze how these improved simulation methods affect financial planning outcomes, sustainable spending estimates, and projections for long-term wealth accumulation.
Key Points From This Episode: (0:00:00) Introduction to expected return modeling and why it matters for financial planning. (0:00:25) The importance of volatility, correlations, distribution shape, and time-series behavior in portfolio projections. (0:01:26) How Scott Cederburg's research on block bootstrapping influenced PWL's thinking on simulations. (0:02:03) Introduction to Columbia Engineering student John Yang and the industry research collaboration. (0:03:30) How Conquest Planning allows PWL to upload custom return simulations. (0:04:05) A new PWL client's detailed reasoning for moving from DIY investing to working with an advisor. (0:06:22) Why financial planning and Monte Carlo simulations were central to the client's decision. (0:07:22) Cross-border financial complexity and the value of professional advice. (0:08:03) Estate planning, cognitive decline, and the role of trusted financial relationships. (0:10:02) Research on cognitive decline and its impact on financial decision-making. (0:12:00) Delegation, accountability, and reducing mental overhead through advisory relationships. (0:13:47) Why the client chose PWL specifically and the appeal of evidence-based investing. (0:15:25) Ben and Braden discuss the perceived disconnect between online discourse and demand for AUM advisors. (0:16:12) Overview of PWL's methodology for estimating expected returns across asset classes. (0:17:05) How PWL combines historical returns with market-implied expected returns. (0:18:07) The use of factor premiums and expected return composition in taxable projections. (0:18:48) Why PWL previously relied on Gaussian multivariate normal distributions for simulations. (0:19:41) Arithmetic vs. geometric mean returns and why the distinction matters. (0:21:01) A simple example illustrating volatility drag. (0:23:29) Why diversification benefits must be incorporated into expected portfolio returns. (0:25:15) How correcting portfolio math improved expected return estimates by 20–30 basis points. (0:27:12) Transition to John Yang's interview and introduction to synthetic data generation. (0:30:07) John explains the limitations of Gaussian return assumptions. (0:31:04) Why realistic sequences of returns matter for retirement planning. (0:32:16) Empirical evidence that returns are not truly random. (0:33:25) The three modeling challenges: unique asset behavior, realistic co-movement, and tail risk. (0:37:49) Separating marginal distributions from dependency structures in the modeling process. (0:38:48) Using a t-copula to better model asset co-movement during market stress. (0:39:39) Why historical data alone struggles to capture rare crisis events. (0:40:06) Applying Extreme Value Theory and Generalized Pareto Distributions to model tail risk. (0:42:15) How Monte Carlo simulations generate many
More from The Rational Reminder Podcast
In this episode, we are joined by Chris Murray, quantitative researcher and former equity quant and trader, and Marco Sammon, Assistant Professor of Finance at Harvard Business School, for an exceptionally nerdy deep dive into leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Drawing on their research, Chris and Marco challenge common assumptions about daily rebalancing, volatility drag, and the long-term performance of leveraged products, offering a more rigorous framework for understanding how these investments actually work.
In this episode, we welcome back Alex Edmans, Professor of Finance at London Business School and author of Grow the Pie, May Contain Lies, and The Madness of Markets. Drawing on academic research and real-world market examples, Alex explores how emotions, social influence, and psychological biases shape investor behavior—and why even apparently irrational markets can be difficult to beat.
In this episode, Ben Felix, Dan Bortolotti, and Kelly Thomas revisit some of the blind spots from their recent discussion about the finances of marriage before diving into a deeply nerdy discussion about leveraged ETFs. Kelly brings a different perspective to questions around spending roles, career sacrifices, financial autonomy, and the mental load of managing household finances.
In this episode, we're joined by Victor Haghani, founder of Elm Wealth and co-author of The Missing Billionaires, for a wide-ranging conversation about how different types of investors shape financial markets. Victor explains the framework behind his forthcoming paper, Who Killed the Random Walk?, and how fundamental investors, static investors, and extrapolators interact to produce momentum, excess volatility, and other market anomalies. We explore why return chasing is different from momentum investing, how investor flows and inelastic demand can move markets, and how the Merton share connects expected returns and risk to portfolio allocation. Victor also discusses long-short direct indexing and tax-loss harvesting, his experiment giving investors tomorrow's Wall Street Journal today, how AI performed in the same trading game, the role of leverage in financial markets, and when borrowing to invest might make sense. We finish with Victor's advice to his younger self: be intentional about financial planning, build financial literacy, and make a plan. Key Points From This Episode: (0:01:20) Lessons from The Missing Billionaires—practical insights on sizing and the Kelly criterion. (0:03:13) Who Killed the Random Walk?—persistent puzzles in stock returns: excess volatility, momentum, fat tails, booms, and busts. (0:05:06) Victor's three investor types: fundamental value investors, static investors, and extrapolators. (0:07:54) How static investors amplify market movements through inelastic demand. (0:11:11) How investor types interact to shape volatility, momentum, and equilibrium. (0:14:02) Wealth flows between investor types and how they create instability in simulations. (0:18:15) Distinguishing extrapolative return chasing from systematic momentum strategies. (0:20:34) How extrapolators create price trends that momentum investors exploit. (0:23:46) The Merton share—risk premiums, volatility, and risk aversion in determining equity exposure. (0:26:39) Combining value and momentum for higher Sharpe ratios. (0:32:34) Long‑short direct indexing and how leverage increases tax‑loss harvesting. (0:34:00) Why fees, complexity, and risk of direct indexing may not be worthwhile without alpha. (0:43:21) The "crystal ball" experiment—advance information, poor sizing, and excessive leverage. (0:49:28) The role of leverage in markets—ETFs, options, embedded leverage, and nonlinear instability. (0:52:50) Why leverage can create nonlinear interactions and amplify market instability. (0:52:55) When borrowing to invest can make sense, particularly for younger investors with substantial human capital and limited financial capital. (0:55:00) Why borrowing costs, expected equity returns, risk, and the possibility of losing a large portion of savings make leverage a difficult decision. (0:57:29) Why the risk-adjusted return from additional equity exposure matters more than the headline expected return. (0:58:42) The relationship between human capital and leverage—and why human capital is not necessarily bond-like. (1:00:01) Victor's advice to his younger self: be proactive, become financially literate, and make a lifetime financial plan. (1:02:18) Why dedicating time to financial education can meaningfully change how people approach financial decisions. Sources From Today's Episode — https://zbib.org/62e42e55fae14cb0a1aa62941d6996a2 Links From Today's Episode:
What happens when a small group of exceptionally wealthy people holds a growing share of a country's income and wealth? And what can economics tell us about the forces behind that concentration?