AI Drive-Thru Backlash | Declining AI Adoption? | KPMG’s 100-Page AI Prompt | AI Coaching Risks
Future-Focused with Christopher LindShow Notes
Happy Friday, everyone! I'm back with another round of updates. This week I've got four stories that capture the messy, fascinating reality of AI right now. From fast food drive-thrus to research to consulting giants, the headlines tell one story, while what's underneath is where leaders need to focus.
Here's a quick rundown. Taco Bell’s AI experiment went viral for all the wrong reasons, but there’s more behind it than memes. Then, I look at new adoption data from the US Census Bureau that some are using to argue AI is already slowing down. I’ll also break down KPMG’s much-mocked 100-page prompt, sharing why I think it’s actually a model of how to do this well. Finally, I close with a case study on AI coaching almost going sideways and how shifting the approach created a win instead of a talent drain.
With that, let’s get into it. ⸻ Taco Bell’s AI Drive-Thru Dilemma Headlines are eating up the viral “18,000 cups of water” order. However, nobody seems to catch that Taco Bell has already processed over 2 million successful AI-assisted orders. This makes the story more complicated. The conclusion shouldn’t be scrapping AI. It’s about designing smarter safeguards, balancing human oversight, and avoiding the trap of binary “AI or no AI” thinking. ⸻ Is AI Adoption Really Declining? New data from Apollo suggests AI adoption is trending downward in larger companies, sparking predictions of a coming slowdown. Unfortunately, the numbers don’t tell the whole story. Smaller companies are still on the rise. Add to that, even the “decline” in big companies may not be what it seems. Many are using AI so much it’s becoming invisible. I explain why this is more about maturity than decline and explain what opportunities smaller players now have. ⸻ KPMG’s 100-Page Prompt: A Joke or a Blueprint? Some mocked KPMG for creating a “hundred-page prompt,” but what they actually did was map complex workflows into AI-readable processes. This isn’t busywork; it’s the future of enterprise AI. By going slow to go fast, KPMG is showing what serious implementation looks like, freeing humans to focus on the “chewy problems” that matter most. ⸻ Case Study: Rethinking AI Coaching A client nearly rolled out AI coaching without realizing it could accelerate attrition by empowering talent to leave. Thankfully, by analyzing engagement data with AI first, we identified cultural risks and reshaped the rollout to support, not undermine, the workforce. The result: stronger coaching outcomes and a healthier organization. ⸻ If this episode was helpful, would you share it with someone? Leave a rating, drop a comment with your thoughts, and follow for future updates that help you lead with clarity in the AI age. And, if you’d take me out for a coffee to say thanks, you can do that here: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/christopherlind — Show Notes: In this Weekly Update, Christopher Lind breaks down Taco Bell’s viral AI drive-thru story, explains the truth behind recent AI adoption data, highlights why KPMG’s 100-page prompt may be a model for the future, and shares a real-world case study on AI coaching that shows why context is everything.
Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction and Welcome 01:18 - Episode Rundown 02:45 – Taco Bell’s AI Drive-Thru Dilemma 19:51 – Is AI Adoption Really Declining? 31:57 – KPMG’s 100-Page Prompt Blueprint 42:22 – Case Study: AI Coaching and Attrition Risk 49:55 – Final Takeaways
#AItransformation #FutureOfWork #DigitalLeadership #AIadoption #HumanCenteredAI
More from Future-Focused with Christopher Lind
In late 2022, GenAI went mainstream and sent organizations and people scrambling to get their arms around the fundamentals of working with chatbots. Four years later, most people still haven't mastered the fundamental, yet we are all being thrust into AI's Trojan Horse moment. The tools being handed to us now are so much more than typing words into a text box. We’re being actively pressured to hand over operational control, digital credentials, and human agency to autonomous software without giving it a second thought.
Every headline you read right now claims software engineering is dead. In fact, many "futurists" predicted there would be no need for humans to do it by now. Allegedly, AI is replacing coders overnight, and early-career talent doesn't stand a chance. However, if you're willing to slow down and actually talk to people in the trenches, the reality looks very different.
AI safety researchers are walking away from millions in unvested equity to take a public stand against tech labs racing toward the apocalypse. Industry leaders are responding with polite, unified calls to "slow down." It's a great distraction, but if you cut through the noise, you realize the immediate threat to your organization isn't AGI. It's corporate drift, empty values, and the silent departure of your top talent.
AI is apparently turning us all into robots. Algorithms are rewiring our brains, flattening human nature, and ending authentic selfhood as we know it. There is even a fancy new (and hard-to-pronounce) academic term for it: Robotoid Humanness. However, if you avoid reacting to the headline and actually look at the research, you'll quickly realize this isn't an inevitable fate that's been sealed. It's an opportunity to examine our passive choices and consider the risks.
As tech giants continue announcing massive multi-gigawatt facilities permitted to match the carbon output of entire nations, the default reaction is often polarized, ideological debate. However, if we stopped arguing for a minute, we’d likely find we all agree trying to infinitely scale compute through brute force is more than an environmental topic. It's creating a major infrastructure crisis that affects us all.