Show Notes
No Austrālijas Latvijas politika dažreiz izskatās citādi. Attālums ne vienmēr ļauj redzēt vairāk, bet reizēm tas ļauj pamanīt modeļus, pie kuriem Latvijā jau esam pieraduši. Šajā No Malas Redzams epizodē Māris uzdod neērtu jautājumu: vai Latvijas politikā sāk veidoties politiskās ģimenes, kurās pazīstams uzvārds, kontakti, partijas ietekme un gadiem uzkrāta atpazīstamība kļūst par mantojamu politisko kapitālu?
Šleseri. Krištopani. Bartaševiči. Rubiki. Bojāri. Šķesteri. Klementjevi. Radniecība pati par sevi nav korupcija, un politiķa bērnam ir tādas pašas tiesības kandidēt kā jebkuram citam Latvijas pilsonim. Bet jautājums paliek: vai viņš tiešām sāk no tās pašas starta līnijas?
Epizodē Māris aplūko arī partiju kontroli pār kandidātu sarakstiem, politisko uzvārdu vērtību, publiski finansētas mediju redzamības priekšrocības un Daugavpils piemēru. Un viņš uzdod jautājumu pašiem jauno politisko dinastiju pārstāvjiem: ja jums patiešām ir izglītība, spējas, enerģija un kontakti, kāpēc nesākt uzņēmumus, neradīt darbavietas un nepalielināt Latvijas bagātību, pirms doties pārvaldīt un pārdalīt valsts naudu? Noslēgumā skats kļūst vēl neērtāks: no padomju nomenklatūras un tās privilēģiju pārmantošanas līdz mūsdienu Krievijas elites bērniem, kuri ieņem ietekmīgus amatus Putina sistēmā.
Latvija nav Padomju Savienība. Latvija nav Krievija. Un tieši tāpēc mums vajadzētu būt īpaši uzmanīgiem pret politisku kultūru, kurā pareizais tēvs, pareizais uzvārds un pareizie kontakti kļūst par tramplīnu uz varu. Viens jautājums vēlētājam varbūt pasaka visu: ja šim kandidātam būtu pavisam cits uzvārds, vai jūs joprojām par viņu balsotu?
ENGLISH Is Latvian Politics Becoming a Family Business? When a surname becomes political capital, is everyone still starting from the same line? From Australia, Latvian politics can sometimes look different. Distance does not necessarily mean you see more, but sometimes it allows you to notice patterns that those living among them have simply grown accustomed to. In this episode of No Malas Redzams, Māris asks an uncomfortable question: is Latvia developing political families in which a famous surname, connections, party influence and decades of accumulated recognition become inherited political capital? The Šlesers family. The Krištopans family. The Bartaševičs family. The Rubiks family. The Bojārs family. The Šķesters family. The Klementjevs family. Family connections are not themselves evidence of corruption, and the child of a politician has exactly the same democratic right to stand for election as any other Latvian citizen. But the question remains: are they really starting from the same line? The episode examines party control over candidate lists, the value of political surnames, the electoral advantage potentially created by publicly funded media visibility, and the Daugavpils example. Māris also challenges the younger members of political families: if you really have the education, ability, energy, and connections attributed to you, why not build businesses, create jobs, and generate wealth for Latvia before entering politics to administer and redistribute public money?. Latvia is not the Soviet Union. Latvia is not Russia. And precisely because it isn't, Latvians should be especially wary of any political culture in which the right father, the right surname and the right connections become a springboard to power. Perhaps one question tells voters everything they need to know: if this candidate had a completely different surname, would you still vote for them?
No Malas Redzams — Latvia as seen by a Latvian from the other side of the world.
Latvijas politika, Saeima, Latvijas vēlēšanas, politiskās ģimenes Latvijā, politiskās dinastijas, Šlesers, Krištopans, Latvijas diaspora, Daugavpils politika, Latvian politics, Latvia political families, Latvian political dynasties, Latvia elections, Latvian diaspora, Soviet nomenklatura, political nepotism, Putin Russia. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more
More from No Malas Redzams
Latvia is facing some uncomfortable questions. Are political promises translating into meaningful action, and can the country's institutions maintain public confidence?
Latvia has voted, the ballots have been counted, and the political landscape has changed dramatically. But winning an election is one thing. Governing a country is another. In this episode of No Malas Redzams, Māris examines the extraordinary results of Latvia's 15th Saeima election, drawing on the 9 October 2026 weekly news briefing from Latvijas Sabiedriskais medijs (LSM). Apvienotais saraksts (United List) has emerged with 41 seats and 35.3% of the vote, while Latvia First and Sovereign Power/Alliance of New Latvians have secured significant parliamentary representation. New Unity has suffered a substantial setback, and the Union of Greens and Farmers has failed to cross the parliamentary threshold. With voter turnout at just 51.81%, the election raises important questions about political representation, public confidence, and Latvia's future direction. But the election is only the beginning. As Prime Minister Andris Kulbergs prepares to form a new government, Māris examines the coalition mathematics, possible political partnerships, and the challenge of turning campaign promises into effective government. And beyond the political manoeuvring, Latvia's everyday problems haven't disappeared.
With Latvia’s 15th Saeima election on 3 October 2026, this episode of No Malas Redzams examines what five political candidates actually said when speaking directly with Latvians in Australia and New Zealand.
ALVIS HERMANIS: KĀPĒC LATVIJA VIŅU KLAUSĀS? Līdz 15. Saeimas vēlēšanām palikušas 27 dienas.