
Asking World Economic Forum Visitors if Greenland Should Become a US State
The Beyond Tomorrow Podcast with Julian IssaShow Notes
Should the U.S. just take Greenland because it can?
As the Arctic melts and critical minerals become the new oil, Greenland has gone from forgotten ice sheet to geopolitical prize. In this Davos street debate, world leaders, policy insiders, and global citizens clash over an unthinkable question: should Greenland become a U.S. state or would that cross the line into modern-day imperialism? Some argue it’s a strategic necessity in a world racing toward conflict with China and Russia. Others warn it would shatter NATO, alienate Europe, and revive the ugliest chapters of colonial history.
What starts as a conversation about minerals and defense quickly spirals into something darker: who really gets to decide the fate of a nation? Is this about security or power? Cooperation or coercion? And if borders can change when resources are at stake, is any country truly safe?
This street interview took place in Davos, Switzerland, during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting, where global leaders, policymakers, executives, and media gather to discuss geopolitics, economics, and global risk. Featuring voices including Kerry Kennedy, @billboardchris, an Arctic defense and security expert, and many more.
⏱ Timestamps 00:00 Should Greenland Become a US State? 03:26 Will the U.S. Invade Greenland? 05:03 Europeans Speak About the Possible Invasion 07:47 The Geographical Factor 10:52 The Arctic is Heating Up
Connect with Julian 📸 Instagram: @thebeyondtomorrowpodcast 🌐 Website: www.beyondtomorrowpodcast.com 📩 Email: [email protected] 🎧 Subscribe on Spotify, Apple, and YouTube for more stories from the edge of what is possible.
More from The Beyond Tomorrow Podcast with Julian Issa
Is “AI will destroy humanity” a real risk, or a story we tell ourselves because we haven’t done the hard engineering?
Do we really know enough about GLP-1 drugs? Mike Israetel breaks down the risks and trade-offs, from anhedonia and calorie-deprived diets to cognitive distortion and the myth of a “zero-harm” default.
What if the fastest way to a longer life isn't a miracle drug, but a wartime mentality against aging?
Are we living in a simulation?
What happens when millions of people hand their lives to AI agents, and nobody has built the rules of the road?