Show Notes
Do the assessments we prepare for students allow them to fully showcase what they've learned? Do marking schemes affect the distribution of marks? And what kind of assessments lead to, or don't lead to, the full range of marks?
Today's episode, the fourth of our Learning and Teaching Conference series, features Dr. Michael Daw, Director of Quality in the Deanery of Biomedical Sciences. Michael's presentation from the conference, "The unintended consequences of approaches to marking and assessment & supporting criteria-based marking", caught our eye with its counterintuitive findings of marking schemes and assessment styles, along with Michael's commitment towards an evidence-based approach towards advising course organizers.
In this episode, Michael discusses what drew him to this analysis and showcases a few of his findings. The conversation then expands, introducing the idea of 'marking culture' within schools with Michael offering a few of his personal experiences. He also speaks about contextual marking and how different styles of assessment generally achieve different outcomes, at least in regards to the range of marks. This conversation begs the question: does your assessment really discriminate learning attainment? And if it doesn't, perhaps Michael's analysis can help steer you in the right direction.
This episode is part one of our conversation with Michael, with part two coming next week, which will entertain the question: why might it be beneficial to use the full range of marks? Is there anything wrong with using a narrow range of marks?
Timestamps
2:02 - Episode specific introduction and Michael on what drew him to this analysis
8:30 - Michael on some of his counterintuitive findings, and why marking schemes may not affect distribution of marks as much as initially thought
15:28 - Michael on marking culture, assessment styles and authentic vs non-authentic assessment
More from Teaching Matters Edinburgh
In part two of this discussion, Student Wellbeing Adviser Tessa Warinner chats with Grace Clark, president of the University of Edinburgh branch of the 93% club. They highlight the impact of financial anxiety and class disparities on student mental health and university experience. This episode belongs to Podcast series: Student Wellbeing.
In this episode, Tessa Warinner, Student Wellbeing Adviser at the university, chats with Grace Clark, president of The University of Edinburgh branch of the 93% club↗️. They discuss the challenges state-educated students face as they transition to university. Listen to how 93% club is making a difference in levelling the playing field for these students. This episode belongs to Podcast series: Student Wellbeing↗️
In this podcast episode, Emily Shaw, undergraduate student studying Interdisciplinary Futures at the Edinburgh Futures Institute, takes us on a journey of understanding 'interdisciplinarity'. Emily brings together voices of students and experts in the field, including Dr David Overend and Dr Gill Robinson. They explore its definitions, implications and real-world applications.
In the final part of this three-part podcast, Wellbeing Advisors Douglas and Tessa talk to Dr Mark Hoelterhoff the four transformations mentioned in the Wellbeing in the Curriculum report, incorporating diverse experiences and what the next few years look like for the wellbeing in the curriculum project. This episode belongs to Podcast series: Student Wellbeing↗️.
In the second part of this three-part podcast, Wellbeing Advisors Douglas and Tessa talk to Dr Mark Hoelterhoff about the examples of other universities work on bringing wellbeing into the curriculum and they discuss some of the potential challenges of doing so. This episode belongs to Podcast series: Student Wellbeing↗️