
Show Notes
Anthropic is a frustrating company.
Sometimes it will do things I greatly appreciate, including at substantial cost. They have taken bold stands, have a unique governance structure and have hired and worked to establish a relatively strong (but I think still inadequate) safety culture.
Other times, it will do things that are deeply disappointing.
It produces very good models. That too is not entirely a good thing.
One can both be the best given the alternatives, and insufficient to meet the moment.
Ultimately, what you think about Anthropic depends on what parts you care about most, and what you think would be sufficient.
Anthropic is great if you think the problems are important and difficult, but within the range of what Anthropic's approaches can solve. If you think we mainly need operational excellence and caring about safety and the future, then there are some non-excellent operations to fix but that goal seems doable for Anthropic. If you think the problems go well beyond that, then things look rather grim for everyone.
Today's post begins with a continuation of discussion over Anthropic's leaked draft bill. See my previous coverage for details of the [...] --- Outline: (01:43) Dario Amodei Responds to Nathan Calvin (20:50) Kelsey Piper Goes Inside Anthropic (26:19) The Technical Problems of AI Safety Are Not Solved (27:50) The Quest for Embedded Evaluators (33:57) METR Questions Risk Report Methodology But Affirms Risk is Low (38:58) The Anthropic Public Benefit Fund (41:39) Anthropic Versus Anthropic ---
First published:
October 27th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZSrX8gucWsKahsitk/anthropic-versus-anthropic
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
--- Images from the article: Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
More from LessWrong posts by zvi
Anthropic filed its S-1 this week to prepare for its IPO. They still have to fill a lot of the numbers including the share price. That still left a lot to be learned, including how the messaging to investors differs from their other rhetoric, and exactly how their corporate control is structured. Anthropic remains a frustrating company, doing a variety of things that often seem in tension with each other.
The full text is finally here, so we are giving it the full RTFB of model card treatment.
Gemini 4's model card is a compact 14 pages. Its safety and security report has 217.
Last week at a small conference, there was talk about a future event referred to as The Hackening. As in, within 6 to 12 months, many predicted that due to advanced AIs and AI agents the internet would become a severely hostile place. Some worried that this could rise to the level of ‘assume any phone connected to the internet is rooted’ and several people urged doing general crisis preparations on a personal level, in case of disruptions in supply lines, power, water or internet.
It was the probably worst day in cybersecurity history. So far. Not only is there a critical flaw in PHP that due to a leak was announced a day before the fix would be available, sending most of the internet scrambling for solutions and likely dooming a lot of long tail websites permanently, there were several other unrelated incidents. The floodgates seem to have been opened. I have a market on whether there will be an even worse day before the end of the year.