Show Notes
The most dangerous colour in a transformation isn't red. It's green. A board that's all green is not a board that's on track. It's a board that's stopped telling you the truth. Years ago I sat in a status review where every line was green. On track, on budget, on plan. I believed it, moved my attention to the fires that were actually burning, and looked away. Under one of those green lines sat a decision nobody had made. Only deferred. Someone had dressed up "we haven't decided this yet" as "this is handled", and the colour let everyone stop looking. By the time it broke into the open, months later, it had grown teeth. I'd taken green to mean done. It doesn't mean done. The programmes that actually deliver aren't the ones with the most green. They're the ones willing to show red early, and to cancel almost nothing late. What you'll take away The line. Green isn't the colour of progress. It's the colour of a deferred decision. The tell. Every line on the dashboard green, and everyone around the table talking in anecdotes rather than decisions. The question. If you stopped announcing for one quarter, what would you actually finish? And on your greenest programme, when did someone last show red?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.builttoabsorb.com
More from Built to Absorb
Think of the one person in your organisation you genuinely couldn't afford to lose. Now the harder question. Why is that true? There are two very different answers, and from the outside they look identical. One is real strength: a person who's made everyone around them better. The other is the most expensive kind of fragility there is, and almost nobody sees it until the person has gone. WHAT YOU'LL TAKE AWAY The line: If a capability lives in one person, you don't own it. You're renting it, until the day they leave. The tell: When your best person leaves, does the capability stay, or does it walk out with them? The question: If your three best people left this quarter, what would still be standing on Monday? Name it, or admit you were renting it. Years ago I joined a business and did the sensible thing. I put my attention where the numbers were red, and left alone the one part that was working. What I didn't weigh was whose results those were. They were his, run out of his own head, never once built into the team around him. Then he left, and the whole function fell off a cliff. The capability I'd trusted had his name on it, not the company's. It walked out in his suitcase, because it had never lived anywhere but in him. Nobody decides to become dependent. You wake up one day and a whole function is one person. The single-point-of-failure audit from this episode is in the written version: https://www.builttoabsorb.com/p/the-suitcase-problem New episode every Wednesday.
Money buys motion. It doesn't buy capability. I ran a reorganisation once that worked perfectly on paper. New teams in six weeks, new structure, new names on the chart, a launch everyone applauded. Then I sat in with one of those teams a few weeks later and watched them push every real decision straight back up the old chain. WHAT YOU'LL TAKE AWAY The line: Money moved at the speed of a memo. Capability moves at the speed of learning. The tell: More capital approved than people who can land it. If that sentence is true of an organisation, it's living the problem, and the strategy deck doesn't get a vote. The question: Are you staffing for the phase you're actually in? Or still paying for the one you just left? I'd changed the drawing. I hadn't changed the company. The boxes had moved. The power hadn't. The incentives hadn't. The habits hadn't. The new structure was running on the old logic. I'd moved the structure at the speed of a memo, and capability moves at the speed of learning. I hadn't waited for it. That mistake scales. For a long time transformation has been told as a story about money: who's funding what, how big the number is, which sector's next. Then the easy money tightens, and it stops being about deploying more and starts being about using what you already bought. Phase one asked whether we could fund it. Phase two asks the harder, quieter question. Can we absorb it. Most of the market is still answering the first question while standing in the second. The written version of this episode is on Substack: [PASTE EP1 POST URL] New episode every Wednesday.
A company I worked with spent a fortune on a new system. A year later I asked to see the usage data. Most people had logged in exactly once, on the day of the training.