Show Notes
Roslyn Layton
December 20, 2022
The midterm election spawned a new political reality and configuration in Washington D.C., letting states will take the lead in technology policy as gridlock dominates Congress. The shift in power from Washington means peril or promise, depending on how lawmakers approach questions around technology. With trifecta control now the norm in state capitols across the country, fewer barriers to passing legislation, and less oversight, good and bad policy will inevitably slip under the radar, despite the national consequences. Edward Longe, Director of the Center for Tech and Innovation at the James Madison Institute and Doctoral Candidate in US History explains the developments data privacy, app stores, right to repair, content moderation, and cybersecurity.
Layton: What do the midterms mean for tech policy?
Longe: By design, Congress is a sclerotic institution. Of the 17,148 bills introduced between January 3rd, 2021, and the 2022 midterm elections, only 632 (4 percent) became law. Such an abysmal track record occurred despite the Democrats holding a trifecta – controlling both chambers of Congress and the White House. After Republicans recaptured the House from 2022 midterm elections and expressed greater interest in oversight, it’s almost certain that fewer bills – except must-pass spending and defense bills – will make it to the President’s desk.
In 2023, 39 states will likely have trifectas, meaning fewer legislative barriers exist to a bill’s passage. Instead of needing bipartisan support, a piece of legislation being considered in a state with a trifecta only needs the backing of the majority party and the governor. These reduced legislative barriers make it likely, given the gridlock in Congress, that many states will take the lead in creating the regulatory environment governing technology and innovation. Technology’s ability to transcend state borders means the decisions taken in state capitols will have national ramifications.
The Republican recapture of the House of Representatives and Democrat control of the Senate means that a federal data standard that has enjoyed bipartisan support will struggle to gain traction. California Democrats demand that any federal statute should follow California’s Consumer Privacy Act or the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation. Many Policy analysts have widely criticized these laws, noting reduced freedom of choice for consumers and increased costs on enterprise with compliance and litigation.
With Congressional Republicans and Democrats so far apart on the issue, state legislatures will inevitably step in and fill the void. So far California, Virginia, Connecticut, Colorado, and Utah have passed data laws, all of which were under a Republican or Democratic trifecta. With a record number of states under trifecta control after the November midterms, it seems likely that, given constituent demands, more states will consider their own data privacy requirements.
While necessary in the absence of congressional action, this new trend will further entrench the 50-state patchwork that raises costs for businesses and leaves millions without appropriate data protections. In an age when lives are increasingly taking place online, this presents a treacherous digital situation for Americans who will find their zip code determining the level of protection, and businesses will face increased compliance costs and an uneven regulatory environment.
Layton: What are other developments do you see with tech policy at the state level?
Longe: Some state legislatures, guided by hostility to large technology companies, could pass misguided bills to regulating safety of app store and complicated “right to repair” rules between consumers and manufacturers. Largely driven by the populist streak dominating political discourse, these bills will leave consumers vulnerable to bad actors and destroy digital ecosystems that have generated substantial value for Amer
More from Spill The Tea
On the latest episode of Spill the Tea, Dr. Bob McClure sits down with JMI’s Director of the Center for Technology and Innovation, Edward Longe, to do a deep dive on tech issues data privacy, cryptocurrency, Tik Tok, and other topics.
December 25, 2022
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
When Lina M. Kahn, Associate Professor of Law at Columbia University, was sworn in as Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), she pledged to “protect the public from corporate abuse.” Unfortunately, in fulfilling this promise, the FTC has turned an increasingly skeptical eye toward mergers and acquisitions, arguing they hurt competitors, the marketplace, and consumers. Aside from the fact that antitrust law has traditionally focused on consumer harm, this increased hostility at the FTC over mergers and acquisitions will disrupt the innovative technology ecosystem that generates significant benefits for American consumers. In disrupting this ecosystem, Chair Kahn’s FTC has declared war on innovation, American consumers, and the competitive marketplace that rewards success.
Despite only being widely available to consumers in the past few years, immersive technology has been around since 1968 when Ivan Sutherland and Bob Sproull released the world’s first virtual reality headset, The Sword of Damocles. While groundbreaking for a society that was 14 years away from the creation of the internet and twenty-nine years away from the invention of Wi-Fi, Sutherland and Sproull’s headset was primitive by today’s standards, only able to “show simple virtual wire-frame shapes” and had to be physically connected to a computer.