Show Notes
What does a phd in cybercrime or cybersecurity do to you and how can you get through the process? With the help of five people that are well on their way to a phd in their respective fields, we will attempt to find out more about the adventure of a doctorate in cyber. In a three-part mini-series we share some perspectives on the experience of this level of study. In this the final part of the series, we find out how the doctoral process changes people, discuss the balance between guidance and freedom in learning to be an independent researcher, how to deal with impostor syndrome and we will receive some sage advice.
More from Cybercrimeology
How can people share hateful and disturbing content online? Dr. Alessandro Moretti from the University of Copenhagen joins us to discuss his research into the aesthetics of cruelty. We explore how this challenges traditional neutralization theory, the importance of context in online communities and what happens when offensive memes escape into the wider internet.
Can the choices made during a cyberattack help tell us who is behind it? Priscilla F. Aybar from Florida International University joins us to discuss her research examining the behaviour of state-sponsored and non-state cyber actors. We talk about rational choice, behavioural signatures, the challenges of cyber incident data and what different approaches to visibility, targeting and disruption might tell us about attribution.
How can the features that make dating apps convenient also create opportunities for harassment? Jennifer Ayerza from George Mason University joins us to discuss how people use dating apps, what they disclose on their profiles and how these choices can affect their experiences. We also discuss what users, platform operators, schools and governments can do to make online dating safer.
How do we study cybercrime when the usual data sources are limited, uneven or built around assumptions from the Global North? Irnasya Hadi joins us to discuss cyber insecurity in Indonesia, public responses to government data breaches and her Snapshot of Society approach to studying digital harm in the Global South. We talk about critical criminology, data breach fatigue, insider and outsider perspectives and why apparent public indifference may actually reveal exhaustion, resignation and institutional failure.
AI agents are changing how people find, consume and evaluate news. Dr. Aengus Bridgman from McGill University joins us to discuss how AI systems interact with journalism, what happens when news is summarized without clear attribution or compensation and why this matters for the future of the information environment.