Show Notes
Your enterprise AI strategy isn’t as far along as you think. The reality for most organizations today is that AI is disrupting existing processes more than it’s delivering outcomes… so far. And according to Dr. Grace Trinidad, Research Director at IDC, that’s how it should be.
In this episode, host Johnny Hand sits down with Dr. Grace to discuss how AI adoption follows the same pattern as almost every major digital transformation, and why this disruption phase we’re in is messy, yet critically important.
What we cover:
How history demonstrates that automation across industries created disruption well before delivering value
Why your AI adoption strategy is much more than simple tool deployment
What business and technology leaders need to consider as they integrate AI into operational workflows
How token consumption and AI FinOps are the emerging security and cost risk
How AI ontologies will be the next real business differentiator
Why stick around:
If you’ve been wondering if your organization’s AI adoption strategy is ahead of the curve, Dr. Grace will give you a much clearer picture of where you really stand.
Episode resources:
Dr. Grace Trinidad on LinkedIn
Securing the AI Enterprise: 5 Key Steps for Business Leaders
Closing the Governance Gap in Agentic AI
Johnny Hand on LinkedIn
TrendAI on LinkedIn
About AI Security Brief
AI Security Brief is where security and technology leaders come to get ahead. Join us for real conversations on the AI trends, threats, and decisions that can't wait.
About TrendAI™
TrendAI™ empowers organizations to lead the future of AI with proactive security designed to inspire innovation and eliminate risk. TrendAI™. AI Fearlessly.
More from AI Security Brief
Your AI initiative gets the green light. But now all the parameters and guardrails you built into your plan need to be executed. Who owns AI once it goes live? Who’s watching as AI use expands? And if the AI workflow fails, can anyone still run the process it replaced?
The “AI trust paradox” in cybersecurity goes like this: organizations invest in AI automation, then hold back from fully implementing it. Yet as attackers continue to use AI to move faster, defenders need to leverage AI to fix things as fast as it finds them.
In traditional IT, isolating a compromised endpoint can stop an attack. In operational technology (OT) environments, that same action could disrupt control of a pipeline, cause a rupture, or trigger environmental damage.
There's no silver bullet when it comes to AI security strategy, and treating one model, tool, or vendor as the answer can limit an organization’s ability to adapt.
Is your organization truly AI native, or did you just bolt AI onto existing infrastructure? Your answer could be an indicator to how much risk you’re carrying without realizing it.