Show Notes
For the final episode of this season of Signals & Stories, we’re going back to where the series began with Vertex Project co-founders visi and John “whippit” Rodgers.
This time, we’re talking about Synapse itself: why it needed to exist, the intelligence problems it was built to solve, what ten years of working alongside analysts has taught us, and where intelligence analysis goes from here.
We dig into why Synapse was designed as a central intelligence system rather than a traditional TIP, the cost of keeping intelligence trapped in reports and siloed tools, and what happens when analysts can turn their previous work into structured, reusable knowledge.
We also look ahead at the role LLMs could play in transforming prose into structured data without replacing human analytical judgment, the growing overlap between CTI, fraud, trust & safety, and other intelligence disciplines, and what Synapse 3 represents after years of analyst feedback and lessons learned.
In this episode:
→ Why the traditional TIP model falls short of broader intelligence analysis → How structured data allows analysts to build on previous knowledge instead of repeatedly reconstructing it → Why Synapse intentionally isn’t a data provider, SIEM, or data lake → The challenge of building a data model that provides structure without dictating the use case → How analyst pain points have shaped Synapse features and workflows → Why powerful intelligence tools sometimes come with a learning curve → Where LLMs can — and shouldn’t — fit into intelligence analysis → Why the future of intelligence may be increasingly interdisciplinary → What Synapse 3 represents after a decade of building and learning
And after 10 episodes reflecting on 10 years of The Vertex Project, whippit sums up the mission pretty simply: “We’re here to help.”
Thanks for joining us for Signals & Stories.
Learn more about The Vertex Project and Synapse: https://vertex.link/
#ThreatIntelligence #CyberThreatIntelligence #IntelligenceAnalysis #Synapse #TheVertexProject
More from Signals & Stories
What happens when the people building intelligence software work side-by-side with the analysts actually using it?
How do you know when intelligence is actually trustworthy?
Every cyber threat intelligence analyst eventually encounters a few uncomfortable truths.
Even the most experienced cyber threat intelligence (CTI) analysts aren't immune to cognitive bias. In this episode of Signals & Stories, the team explores some of the most common analytical pitfalls that can quietly influence investigations and how strong analytical tradecraft helps avoid them.
In this episode of Signals & Stories, Kali Fencl sits down with Jennifer Kolde (thesilence), Principal Intelligence Analyst at The Vertex Project, and cyber threat intelligence expert, Kamil Bojarski, to explore how attribution has evolved over the last decade.