Summary
The recent resurgence of the Englishness debate has sparked intense discussions among political commentators and cultural analysts. The conversation centers around the complexities of English identity, particularly in light of comments made by politicians like Suella Braverman, who questioned why English people cannot claim a distinct identity. This has led to a broader examination of what it means to be English versus British, with panelists noting that while Britishness encompasses a more inclusive identity, Englishness often feels exclusionary and tied to nationalistic sentiments.
The discussion also touches on the implications of identity politics, with some arguing that the push for a clearer definition of Englishness is driven by bad faith actors seeking to serve their own agendas. The panelists explore how regional identities complicate the national narrative, highlighting that many people feel a stronger connection to their local or regional roots than to a broader national identity. This complexity is further exacerbated by the rise of far-right rhetoric, which seeks to define Englishness in narrow, often xenophobic terms.
In addition to the Englishness debate, the episode addresses international issues such as the recent riots in France and the implications of the US midterm elections. The panelists express concern that political extremism is on the rise, with the potential for both left and right-wing parties to capitalize on social unrest. The discussion concludes with reflections on the role of identity in shaping political landscapes, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced understanding of citizenship that transcends simplistic definitions based on ethnicity or nationality.
Show Notes
Who ordered the heated debate about Englishness? Open any newspaper or social media feed and you’ll stumble on some histrionic handwringing about “what it means it be English”. Who decided we needed to talk about this, all the time? And how thin is the cover it provides for your good old actual homegrown racism? We debate the debates in a conversation which contains cricket, Suella Braverman, Paddington, an “orchestra of dogwhistles”, Norman Tebbit, GB News’s “British-only radio station”, and surprising revelations about both of Seth’s grand-dads. Guaranteed relevant to Scottish, Irish and Welsh listeners too, honest.
Plus: the Jackdaw gas field, the US mid-terms, Liz Truss’s book and other ecological disasters.
• Questions for But Your Emails? Thoughts? Comments? Email us at [email protected].
ESCAPE ROUTES
• Hannah recommends The Diplomat on Netflix.
• Jason thinks you should go and see the documentary NAZA, in which Israeli whistleblowers expose Netanyahu’s military methods.
• Marie was “blown away” by the two de Gaulle movies, Résistance and Liberté.
• Seth recommends Michael Crick’s Twittex feed Tomorrow’s MPs which does what it says on the tin.
Support us on Patreon for the Extra Bit and more.
Presented by Seth Thévoz with Hannah Fearn, Jason Hazeley and Marie le Conte. Audio Production by Tom Taylor. Art direction: James Parrett. Theme tune by Tom Taylor and Simon Williams. Managing Editor: Jacob Jarvis. Group Editor: Andrew Harrison. OH GOD, WHAT NOW? is a Podmasters production.
www.podmasters.co.uk Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
More from Oh God, What Now?
Rupert Lowe of Restore UK claims that street violence is not just inevitable but necessary “if we are to save our home”. Elsewhere, the far-right pals up with street thugs – and its leaders walk right up to the line of endorsing extra-legal direct action because democracy has supposedly failed. Is the rising tide of violent rhetoric spilling over into actual physical attacks? We talk about why politics is sounding increasingly violent – and how it’s not just on the far-right. Plus: Trump’s betrayal of Ukraine sinks deeper into perfidy, can Burnham ban loudcasting on public transport, and why we should send squirrels to the White House.
• This edition recorded before Trump cancelled livestreaming the execution of the Fort Hood killer.
Andy Burnham has finally said what we’ve all been thinking: Russia meddled in Brexit. Is this brave honesty – or the first step on the long road back to Brussels? Plus, the Greens are still in turmoil with Zack Polanski’s leadership now in doubt. What does it mean for everyone else on the left? Is a progressive alliance just a pipe dream now? Are the Tories back from the dead – and has anyone checked on Reform?
Labour wins the Holborn & St Pancras handily – but the Greens had staked a lot on Zack Polanski winning and he failed. Is Polanski’s nightmare week over the Zionism vote a symptom of deeper weaknesses in his leadership? Is far-left entryism destroying the Greens? And why Labour’s victorious candidate Sagal Abdi-Wali symbolises the best of Britain. Steve Richards of Rock & Roll Politics joins Andrew Harrison for the Holborn postmortem.
Has Burnham really broken Britain’s bizarre, self-enforced silence around the disaster that is Brexit? What would a real pro-EU membership stance from Labour mean for British politics? And would killing off Brexit inadvertently give a flagging Farage his mojo back? Plus, in the week that Jeffrey Archer died we discuss why establishment Britain will give a pass to any charlatan, bullshitter and perjurer provided he’s amusing at parties. And our special guest Sebastian Salek – good news columnist at LabourList – explains why he fights the good fight on GBNews.