Episode 12: the effect of the Corona Virus on supply contracts and legal obligations

A very brief review of some of the basics of how GST should be treated in a civil claim, in light of a recent case: Dodds v Southern Response (2019).

An analysis of the NZ Court of Appeal's decision in Avonside Holdings Ltd v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2014] NZCA 483.

A review of the recent NZ High Court decision Holler & Rouse v Osaki [2014] NZHC 1977 (20 August 2014, Justice Keane).

Changes to the barrister intervention rule in NZ are imminent.

An update on two recent insurance cases: Campbell v Southern Response and Ridgecrest v IAG.