Show Notes
In this episode we have a wide ranging discussion on the human in cybersecurity with Dr. Iain Reid from the University of Portsmouth. We get into the application of psychology to cybersecurity including deception, risk perception, and responsibility We talk about who carries the burden of defence, how software developers think about security, and what deception looks like in both cybercrime and cyberwarfare.
More from Cybercrimeology
How can people share hateful and disturbing content online? Dr. Alessandro Moretti from the University of Copenhagen joins us to discuss his research into the aesthetics of cruelty. We explore how this challenges traditional neutralization theory, the importance of context in online communities and what happens when offensive memes escape into the wider internet.
Can the choices made during a cyberattack help tell us who is behind it? Priscilla F. Aybar from Florida International University joins us to discuss her research examining the behaviour of state-sponsored and non-state cyber actors. We talk about rational choice, behavioural signatures, the challenges of cyber incident data and what different approaches to visibility, targeting and disruption might tell us about attribution.
How can the features that make dating apps convenient also create opportunities for harassment? Jennifer Ayerza from George Mason University joins us to discuss how people use dating apps, what they disclose on their profiles and how these choices can affect their experiences. We also discuss what users, platform operators, schools and governments can do to make online dating safer.
How do we study cybercrime when the usual data sources are limited, uneven or built around assumptions from the Global North? Irnasya Hadi joins us to discuss cyber insecurity in Indonesia, public responses to government data breaches and her Snapshot of Society approach to studying digital harm in the Global South. We talk about critical criminology, data breach fatigue, insider and outsider perspectives and why apparent public indifference may actually reveal exhaustion, resignation and institutional failure.
AI agents are changing how people find, consume and evaluate news. Dr. Aengus Bridgman from McGill University joins us to discuss how AI systems interact with journalism, what happens when news is summarized without clear attribution or compensation and why this matters for the future of the information environment.