Show Notes
Ghosts of Elections Past, Present, and Future: We talked to Rick Pildes (NYU Law) a few days after the Moore v. Harper oral argument, the “independent state legislature” case that instilled many worries about the Court opening a door to state legislatures overriding the popular vote. While those fears were unfounded (so to speak), this case raises other concerns that federal courts will get more intwined with elections and will block state courts from enforcing their constitutions, overturning impermissible gerrymanders, and providing remedies.
In “Ghosts of Elections Past, Present, and Future,” we talk about how this case is haunted not only by the 2020 election and a fake electors scheme based on the Electors Claus(e), it is also haunted by ghost-of-election-past Bush v. Gore and the ghosts-of-election-future. We also ask, “Do You Hear What I Hear?” The left embracing Rehnquist’s Bush v. Gore concurrence? Jed also observes a Festivus Airing of Grievances about conservatives’ originalism errors and the Democrats’ litigation strategy. There was barely enough historical evidence to sustain one hour of oral argument, but the Court made it last for what felt like eight. We also talk to Rick about election law in an era of fragmentation (North Pole-arization?)
Rick is the Sudler Family Professor at NYU Law School and a co-creator of the major casebook in this field, The Law of Democracy. He has served on President Biden appointed him to the President’s Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States. As a lawyer, Pildes has successfully argued voting-rights and election-law cases before the United States Supreme Court, and was part of the Emmy-nominated NBC breaking-news team for coverage of the 2000 Bush v. Gore contest.
More from Constitutional Crisis Hotline
For the final episode of the Constitutional Crisis Hotline Season 1 , Fordham Law experts on constitutional law and statutory interpretation reflect on the Supreme Court's recent decisions.
In this episode, Julie talks with Corey Brettschneider, author of The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents about the federal indictment of Donald Trump and what it will mean for Trump’s ambitions to retake the Presidency.
In this episode, leading feminist scholar Deborah Tuerkheimer joins Julie and Jed to discuss Julie’s new book, After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women What to Do about It (publishing today!).
What is the future of constitutional rights protections and equal citizenship in our constitutional democracy? Is substantive due process over after Dobbs, or can we reconstruct it? We talk with Jim Fleming (Boston University School of Law, JD/PhD) about his recent book, “Constructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process” (2022), in conversation with Ken Kersch (Boston College, Political Science, JD/PhD), an expert on conservative political and legal thought, and working on a new book "The Right Rights: The Conservative Encounter with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, 1954-1980."
In this episode, Kathleen Sullivan and Jesse Wegman join Jed and Julie to discuss whether Congress can declare the Equal Rights Amendment ratified and part of the Constitution fifty years after it proposed the amendment to the states.