
Episode 34 - Short Noses, Big Problems: Lumps, Chins and Comorbidities in Brachycephalics (Laura Buckley)
The Skin Flint PodcastShow Notes
Chapter 1 – “Lumps, Not Bugs: Cracking the ‘Sterile’ Case” 03:22 – John welcomes Dr Laura Buckley back for part two on brachycephalic skin disease and tees up two topics: Sterile Granuloma/Pyogranuloma Syndrome (SGPS) and Muzzle Folliculitis/Furunculosis, plus how to manage comorbidities. Laura explains it’s an uncommon, immune‑mediated nodular skin disease of dogs involving histiocytic cells (macrophages). No infectious agent is found and it responds to immunomodulatory therapy. 04:43 – Sue asks which brachy breeds are most affected and typical ages. Laura most often sees Boxers, British Bulldogs, some Mastiffs and (in her clinic) many Staffordshire Bull Terriers. Usual onset is middle‑aged, though younger dogs can be affected. 05:21 – Sue asks what it looks like. Laura: papules, nodules or plaques (mm to several cm), localised or generalised; often on trunk, but head/limbs too. Typically non‑painful and non‑pruritic; may be erythematous, haired or alopecic; sometimes eroded/ulcerated with crusting - the key is a nodular process. 07:20 – Sue asks for key differentials. Laura highlights superficial bacterial folliculitis as the big rule‑out in short‑coated brachys (tufted hairs). Cytology helps: infection shows neutrophils with intracellular cocci (staphylococci); a sterile process shows inflammatory cells without bacteria. 07:49 – Laura notes most SGPS nodules are intact, so fine‑needle aspirates (multiple nodules) are preferred over impression smears. Expect many neutrophils and macrophages; bacteria should be absent. 08:23 – Sue asks about deep fungal disease and other infections. Laura: you can’t reliably exclude on cytology alone—next step is biopsy. Remove a whole nodule if possible so histopathology can section through it and use special stains for atypical organisms (bacteria, deep fungi, parasites, protozoa). This thorough exclusion is critical before immunosuppression. 10:11 – Sue asks how to submit samples. Laura often splits: submit an entire nodule (or half) in formalin for histopathology and keep a second small sample (e.g., 4 mm punch from another lesion) chilled/frozen pending culture. Direct to bacteriology or mycology depending on histopath hints. 11:01 – John asks about treatment and prognosis. Laura finds most dogs do well: disease may wax and wane but responds to therapy; rare spontaneous resolution reported. Start with glucocorticoids (prednisolone). Typical immunosuppressive dose 2–4 mg/kg (sometimes 1–1.5 mg/kg suffices; she often starts at 2 mg/kg). If response is poor or steroid side effects are problematic, add cyclosporine at 5 mg/kg once daily; azathioprine has been used. For localised lesions, topical hydrocortisone aceponate spray can help. 13:24 – Sue asks for a prednisolone protocol. Laura: baseline haematology/biochemistry/urinalysis before starting. Recheck at 2–3 weeks for tolerance and early response; continue same dose another 2–3 weeks to resolution, then taper by ~20% every couple of weeks. Once down to ~0.5 mg/kg, move to alternate‑day dosing. Add cyclosporine if lesions recur on taper to avoid long‑term steroid adverse effects (PU/PD/PP, lethargy/weight gain; long‑term risk: calcinosis cutis). With dual therapy or cytotoxics, schedule regular bloods (after 1 month, then every 2–3 months). Chapter 2 – “Chins Up: Muzzle Mayhem, Managed” 17:05 – John pivots to Muzzle Folliculitis/Furunculosis: what is it and who gets it? Laura: a bacterial follicular disease confined to the muzzle skin, common in coarse/bristly‑coated brachys—British & French Bulldogs, Pugs, Shar‑Pei, Boxers. 18:04 – John asks what drives it. Laura: often linked to allergic skin disease; facial folds create many “mini‑intertrigo” sites. Pruritus → rubbing/trauma to bristly follicles. She suspects a sterile inflammatory start that quickly progresses to secondary bacterial folliculitis. 20:13 – Sue asks if this is the same as acne. Laura: no - acne is a keratinisation disorder (e.g., plugged follicles; cla
More from The Skin Flint Podcast
CHAPTER 1 – Rosanna’s 2 Pennies Worth This month, Sue, John and Paul welcome Rosanna Marsella to the platform - Diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Dermatology and Professor at the University of Florida. 03:57 – John invites Rosanna to introduce herself. Thirty years as a veterinary dermatologist at the University of Florida, teaching, researching and treating small-animal allergy alongside some large-animal work; Florida's climate means plenty of infections. 04:42 – John asks how she'd categorise pyoderma. Rosanna explains it's classified by depth: surface pyoderma (often the "hot spot"), superficial pyoderma (essentially bacterial folliculitis), and deep pyoderma, where infection breaches the follicle wall into the dermis (furunculosis). 05:35 – Sue asks how dysbiosis differs from surface pyoderma. Allergic dogs already have reduced microbiome diversity, which shifts sharply toward Staphylococcus during a flare; dysbiosis is that pre-pustular shift, while surface pyoderma is the acute inflammatory skin-barrier damage that follows. 07:45 – Sue asks what AMD looks like clinically. Rosanna describes the classic picture: thick-coated dogs developing intensely pruritic, erosive lesions almost overnight on the face, rump or hips, driven by an acute trigger plus moisture trapped against the skin. 09:01 – John asks how important it is to find the trigger rather than just treat the lesion. Miss it, Rosanna says, and the dog either won't fully respond or will relapse. 09:54 – John runs through the usual suspects - fleas, allergic skin disease, ear disease, trapped moisture, pain, boredom. Rosanna splits these into predisposing factors (thick coat, heat, humidity, swimming) and primary triggers, ranking fleas top: an oral flea product still needs the flea to bite before it works, so a flea-allergic dog may also need a repellent. 13:37 – Sue asks whether lesion distribution helps distinguish flea-driven AMD from other allergies. Rosanna's rule of thumb: the back half of the body is fleas until proven otherwise; facial lesions warrant a work-up for pollen allergy or Malassezia otitis, both intensely itchy in their own right. 17:07 – John asks Sue whether "fleas first" holds in the UK climate too. Sue agrees fleas should be ruled out in every case, even with fast-acting isoxazoline parasiticides on board. CHAPTER 2 – More Than Skin Deep
In this month's episode, Sue, John and Paul welcome Professor & Chief of Service (Dermatology) at UC Davis, Stephen D White to the podcast. Chapter 1: Sheep Skin Detectives (03:09) Sue sets the scope: primary-care perspective rather than rare autoimmune disease. Stephen confirms autoimmune skin disease is vanishingly rare in sheep (pemphigus foliaceus essentially unreported, bar one Barbary sheep case in a zoo). (06:10) Sue asks whether clinical distribution helps localise the cause in a pruritic sheep the way it does in a dog or cat. Stephen explains it's less reliable — thick wool can mask hair loss even with significant pruritus, though rubbing behaviour is usually evident. Lice are visible with a hand lens; mites are not. (08:07) Question on empirical response to treatment. Stephen notes lice usually respond well to licensed ectoparasiticides (mainly avermectins); isoxazolines are unlicensed in ruminants and unreported in sheep specifically (though used in camelids, and anecdotally a bighorn sheep). Repeat treatment at 2–4 weeks is usually needed to catch hatching eggs. Chapter 2: Suspect Number 1 - Ectoparasites (11:30) John asks for top differentials in a pruritic sheep, Stephen answers: “ectoparasites, ectoparasites, and ectoparasites” — mites, lice and sheep keds (which are insects, not mites). He stresses checking in-contact sheep, since one animal may be subclinical while another is severely affected. (13:49) Sue asks why would a referral centre see an ectoparasite case at all? Stephen: usually a failed or incomplete owner-applied treatment, or a backyard sheep simply not monitored closely enough for early signs. (15:29) On technique: always scrape if pruritic, using a medical-grade spatula rather than a blade (sheep are skittish; a slip with a blade causes injury). An otoscope with the cone removed doubles as a magnifier and light source. Dermatophytosis should also be considered — often presenting as facial alopecia rather than fleece loss — and can coexist with ectoparasitism. (15:09) John ask about photosensitisation. Stephen distinguishes hepatogenous causes (impaired phylloerythrin metabolism from hepatotoxic plants, or a genetic defect in Corriedale lambs) from primary photodynamic plant ingestion (e.g. St John's Wort). Lesions favour the head and distal limbs. Flock-wide cases point to an environmental cause (send hay/pasture samples to the local extension lab); idiosyncratic reactions (as seen with clover in horses) may occur but are poorly documented in ruminants. Chapter 3: Dermatological Movie Stars (26:48) John introduces orf, referencing its cameo in Sheep Detectives. Stephen describes it as a parapoxvirus infection, usually self-limiting, but causing anorexia through oral pain — a problem in production settings. A non-resolving “super orf” form causes severe weight loss. Stephen shares data from the retrospective study: of ten orf-affected sheep, five were euthanised, due to generalised cutaneous lesions or concurrent Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis abscesses — evidence that orf can significantly compromise immune function. One case of orf-associated facial alopecia resolved fully once the virus cleared. (31:07) On zoonotic risk and management: gloves are essential when handling any crusting lesion in sheep or goats. Management includes moistening hay to ease painful feeding, antibiotics for secondary bacterial infection, and parenteral treatment or stomach tubing in severe anorexia. (33:17) Sue asks about bacterial skin disease. Stephen identifies C. pseudotuberculosis and staphylococcal abscesses as the main presentations — often large, anywhere on the body, commonly peri udder in females. Internal abscessation (lungs, liver) is a key concern; aspirated purulent masses warrant involving a large-animal colleague, with caution against environmental contamination during drainage. Dermatophilosis is discussed as globally widespread and rain-associated, presenting dorsally, or interdigi
In this episode of Skinflints, we are joined by veterinary dermatologist Dr Stephen Shaw to discuss the role of JAK inhibitors in managing canine atopic dermatitis. Stephen explains the underlying disease process, highlighting the key cytokines involved in itch and inflammation, and how JAK inhibitors provide rapid, broad-spectrum control by blocking these signalling pathways. The discussion explores how treatment should be tailored to each individual dog, considering disease severity, secondary infections and long-term management goals. Stephen also explains the benefits of using JAK inhibitors during food trials, their role alongside other therapies, and practical considerations such as monitoring, vaccination and managing concurrent disease. The episode concludes by emphasising the importance of evidence-based treatment, informed owner discussions and regular clinical assessment, reinforcing that successful management relies on selecting the right therapy for each patient rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach. This episode is kindly sponsored by MSD Animal Health
(00:00:00) John introduces a new episode on Feline Orofacial Pain Syndrome (FOPS) — a baffling condition where cats can flip from calm to frantic self-injury around the mouth and face in seconds.