Traveontaye Berry: The Other Name | 52 Years in Just 2 Hours P7
One Minute Remaining - Stories from the inmatesShow Notes
Over the course of this investigation, a name keeps surfacing. Multiple times. Multiple witnesses. In interviews with police, in statements given in the hours and days after Carl Green Jr. was shot, three separate people mention this individual in connection with the crime.
According to witness accounts, this person was present that night. This person allegedly had a weapon. And perhaps most significantly, this person had previously threatened Carl Green Jr.
So why was Traveontaye Berry the only person arrested?
In Part Seven, we examine what investigators knew about this alternative suspect, what they chose to investigate, and what they chose to ignore as they built their case against a 16-year-old boy.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I need to be really clear about something. No one other than Trae has ever been arrested, charged, tried or convicted for the murder of Carl Green Jr. The other people mentioned in these interviews have never been charged with anything in connection with this case, and some have denied any involvement. What we're examining here is what investigators considered, what witnesses said, and the choices police made in directing their investigation toward one suspect whilst potential leads involving others went unexplored.
This is Part Seven of Traveontaye Berry's story: 52 Years in Just 2 Hours. SIGNAL AWARDS 2026 VOTE NOW xx
EARLY AND AD FREE ACCESS: for as little as $1.69 a week!
Apple + HERE
Patreon and find us on Facebook here. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More from One Minute Remaining - Stories from the inmates
The case against Traveontaye Berry was built on a foundation of procedural failures, forensic gaps, and witness contamination.
The jury deliberated for less than two hours.
By the time Traveontaye Berry's case reached trial in February 2015, he had already faced a choice most teenagers should never have to make: accept a plea deal or roll the dice in a courtroom.
Over the past seven episodes, we’ve examined the physical evidence gaps, the witness contamination, the unrecorded photo lineup, and the investigative decisions that led to Traveontaye Berry’s conviction.
In Episode Five, we heard how police brought two eyewitnesses into the same room and had them confront each other about conflicting accounts. Now, in Part Six, we examine something equally troubling.