E176 - Journal Club with David Maslove on Cash Incentives for Peer Review
Cold Steel: Canadian Journal of Surgery PodcastShow Notes
Clip of Senate hearing with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. That was a clip from a Senate hearing with Robert F Kennedy Jr, who, as many listeners will know, is the current US Secretary of Health and Human Services. In 2025, many folks around the world have become interested in the way that science currently works, particularly around the process of peer review. Peer review is a process where scientific journals ask experts in the field to evaluate the validity and accuracy of articles that are submitted to the journal. There are many challenges around peer review in the modern era, and one particularly thorny one is finding reviewers who have the time and expertise to provide high-quality reviews. David Maslove is a Clinician Scientist in the Departments of Medicine and Critical Care Medicine at Queen’s University. He, along with economist Chris Cotton and a team of other researchers, recently published an article in the Journal of Critical Care Medicine entitled “Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial”. Dr. Maslove performed what is, in some ways, a very simple study conceptually – does paying reviewers increase the rate at which reviewers complete their reviews? We delve into this study in depth and hear Dr. Maslove’s thoughts on this really important topic. What do you think? Do you think peer reviewers should be paid? Send us your thoughts via email at [email protected] or on X @coldsteelpod. Links: Cotton CS, Alam A, Tosta S, Buchman TG, Maslove DM. Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial. Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006637. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40047491. Maslove DM, Tang B, Shankar-Hari M, Lawler PR, Angus DC, Baillie JK, Baron RM, Bauer M, Buchman TG, Calfee CS, Dos Santos CC, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Gordon AC, Kellum JA, Knight JC, Leligdowicz A, McAuley DF, McLean AS, Menon DK, Meyer NJ, Moldawer LL, Reddy K, Reilly JP, Russell JA, Sevransky JE, Seymour CW, Shapiro NI, Singer M, Summers C, Sweeney TE, Thompson BT, van der Poll T, Venkatesh B, Walley KR, Walsh TS, Ware LB, Wong HR, Zador ZE, Marshall JC. Redefining critical illness. Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1141-1148. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01843-x. Epub 2022 Jun 17. PMID: 35715504. Maslove DM, Badawi O. The Many Faces of Prediction Modeling in Critical Care. Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):687-689. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005409. PMID: 35311775. https://med.stanford.edu/master-clinical-informatics-management/stanford-clinical-informatics/ms-phd-in-biomedical-informatics.html
More from Cold Steel: Canadian Journal of Surgery Podcast
How can we better prepare ourselves and our trainees for sitting the oral exam? By this point, residents have typically already passed their written exam. And so they have the book knowledge, but how do you get that book knowledge from inside your brain to your mouth and obvious obviously, onto your examiner and onto their page? To answer that question, I invited Dr. Sorena Afshar onto the podcast this week.
Why is a surgical podcast talking about tax credits????
AI is likely to change the way that medical and surgical education happens over the next decade. We needed to find out how, and Dr. Samir Grover joined us on this episode to talk about it.
Jeremy Heffner is a trauma and acute care surgeon at Lima Memorial Health System in Ohio. He is also the Chief Operating Officer of SurgeON, a social media company dedicated to surgeons. Heffner was also previously a bioengineer who worked at NIH. He has been incredibly open about his journey and struggles with PTSD as a surgeon, and how those struggles ultimately caused his breakdown. Sadly, Dr. Heffner's story is not unique, and we brought him on the podcast to hear his insights about how many surgeons struggle with PTSD.