
Show Notes
“The White House has been trying to get their arms around solutions for 25 years. If you look back at the very earliest White House document (Presidential Decision Directive 63), it came out in 1998. They're focused on critical infrastructure. They say, within five years, most of America’s critical infrastructure will be secure, as if it was a one off as if we could just get it right once, and then it would just be secure. But of course, we have intelligent adversaries, and we keep inventing new technology.” -Jason Healey
Jason Healey, a Senior Research Scholar at Columbia University’s School for International and Public Affairs, joins us for this episode of Hack the Plant. We discuss an article he recently published at the Lawfare Institute, looking at 25 years of White House cyber policies, from the Clinton to the Biden Administrations. What changes have we made in our regulatory approach over the past 25 years? What are current strengths - and threats - in our cyber defense systems? Join us to learn more.
More from Hack the Plant
“There is so much tech in our food and agriculture industry now that is touching our food on some level… we are creating the potential for a foodborne illness to happen from a cyber attack that may not be noted.” – Kristin King
“Securing critical infrastructure is not one person’s job. You bring multiple people, multiple teams with different expertise to come together.” – Adam Robbie
“Security is not convenient. Nobody likes change. But at the same time, we have to be secure. Finding that middle ground is the challenge in my position.” - Andrea Haddad
“The fundamentals of cybersecurity are the fundamentals of good engineering and operations.” - Andrew Ohrt
“I think it really opened my eyes to how tightly coupled our system is and how vulnerable we are to these cascading failures.” - Natalie Sullivan