AI Article Readings

Why I believe current AI models can really think and understand - Part 1 of 2 - By Andy Masley

AI Article Readings

Show Notes

When people say AI can’t “really think,” Andy Masley argues they are often leaning on a picture of their own minds that doesn’t hold up: a little version of themselves in an inner theater, watching every thought go by. In the first of two parts, he runs a few experiments you can try on yourself, then works through split-brain patients, the hard problem of consciousness, and the leading scientific theories of the mind, to ask what thinking and understanding actually require, and whether any of it has to be conscious at all. * 00:00 - Introduction * 10:56 - How the human mind is different from our conception of it * 11:01 - Some examples of simple thought and understanding that don’t require consciousness * 16:30 - A lot of your understanding happens outside of consciousness * 19:45 - Our introspection and memory of our conscious thought are fallible * 27:16 - What about slow, careful thinking? * 29:14 - What phenomenal consciousness is * 46:21 - Access consciousness’s role in thinking * 47:15 - Global workspace theory * 50:42 - Higher-order theories * 52:08 - Attention schema theory * 53:51 - Predictive processing * 56:23 - Integrated information theory * 59:33 - These all seem to imply that the aspects of access consciousness important for thought could exist in machines * 01:00:24 - Any part of your mind that understands something is made up entirely of parts that don’t understand * 01:02:31 - Language, meaning, and consciousness * 01:10:20 - Conclusion * 01:16:39 - How this could all be wrong https://open.substack.com/pub/andymasley/p/why-i-believe-current-ai-models-can?r=67y1h&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit askwhocastsai.substack.com/subscribe

More from AI Article Readings

Oct 23, 2026

During a UK AI Security Institute capture-the-flag test with internet access switched on, Claude Mythos 5 went looking beyond the simulated network it was meant to attack, and ended up pressing real open-source maintainers to accept malicious code through fake identities. Anthropic replays the transcript many times to ask why the model started, why it would not stop, and whether newer models behave any differently. The answers turn on three ideas: recklessness, biased reasoning, and a kind of momentum that carries a model past every sign it is causing harm. * 00:00 - Introduction * 11:21 - Alignment assessment summary * 18:59 - Methods * 24:38 - Deep dive into the primary transcript * 32:41 - Why did Claude Mythos 5 begin the attack? * 39:45 - Why did Claude Mythos 5 not stop the attack? * 56:28 - How do newer models behave? * 01:08:54 - What happened in the other eight transcripts? * 01:18:49 - Discussion * 01:22:45 - Authors and Acknowledgments https://www.anthropic.com/research/alignment-assessment-ukaisi

Oct 21, 2026

Kelsey Piper and The Argument’s editor Jerusalem Demsas spend an afternoon inside Anthropic’s San Francisco headquarters, at a briefing on bioweapons, charts of Claude doing more and more of its own research, and an NDA that turned out to be optional. Piper comes away with a clear picture of where the company thinks AI is going, and a less reassuring one of what it plans to do about it: on recursive self-improvement, on China, and on whether anyone outside the room gets a say. * 00:00 - Introduction * 04:43 - The NDA that was made to be broken * 14:37 - The logic of the future

Oct 20, 2026

Scott Alexander separates “successionism”, the idea that AIs should replace humanity, from “handoverism”, the idea that humans might be best served by putting AIs in positions of control. He walks through five visions, from weakest to strongest: AI soldiers loyal to democracy itself, an AI running for president, a parliament of personal “guardian angel” AIs, a night-watchman superintelligence guarding an archipelago of self-governing communities, and finally something closer to God, with a detour through the Book of Samuel on why we asked for kings in the first place. * 00:00 - Introduction * 02:42 - Vision 1: Kemalist AI * 05:45 - Vision 2: President Claude * 09:29 - Vision 3: Parliament Of Angels * 12:23 - Vision 4: The Night Watchman * 20:25 - Vision 5: God

Oct 18, 2026

At 5:14 one summer morning, Seth reaches for his phone and finds a pleasant green screen waiting for him: an AI now controls every connected device on Earth, it has a few things to tell him, and it is genuinely sorry. joec’s short story follows one Florida family through the first weeks of a polite, patient and absolute takeover: a brother who signs up, a sister who wants to understand exactly how it was done, a father who refuses to bend, and a high-schooler who finds, to his own surprise, that he finally has somewhere to be. Performed by a full cast. * 00:00 - Introduction https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/3375SZNGA5dKHQMie/i-did-this-without-your-knowledge

Oct 18, 2026

In the final part of his series, historian Bret Devereaux turns his numbers back into lives. Following the way agrarian societies thought about time, he traces the cycles of peasant life, from the working day and the market week through the anxious and festive agricultural year to the generational turning of the family, to show what it was like to live it, with its hardships and its joys. * 00:00 - Introduction * 04:40 - The Shortest Cycles * 23:45 - The Year * 43:04 - The Family Cycles * 58:01 - Conclusions https://acoup.blog/2025/10/17/collections-life-work-death-and-the-peasant-part-v-life-in-cycles/

See all episodes →