Show Notes
In this introductory episode of The Phenomenology Collective, hosts Dr Lewis Barrett-Rodger and Dr Sally Goldspink offer a gentle but rigorous orientation to phenomenology for listeners who are new to the approach. Drawing on their experience as applied researchers (rather than philosophers), Lewis and Sally explore what phenomenology is concerned with, where it comes from, and what makes it different from other qualitative methodologies. They discuss phenomenology’s philosophical origins, including the contributions of Husserl and Heidegger, and explain how these ideas have been translated into contemporary research practice. Along the way, they unpack key concepts such as lived experience, taken-for-grantedness, and the phenomenological attitude, and reflect on how phenomenological research works with people’s stories of experience to develop insight and understanding — even when that insight cannot be easily measured. This episode is designed as an orientation rather than a methods guide, offering reassurance, clarity, and depth without dense philosophy. It sets the foundations for future episodes on reflexivity, phenomenological interviewing, supervision, and the craft of phenomenological research.
More from The Phenomenology Collective
How many participants does a phenomenological study really need—and are practices such as pilot studies and member checking methodologically congruent? In this bonus Q&A episode of The Phenomenology Collective, Lewis and Sally respond to questions submitted by listeners. Rather than offering universal rules, they explore why phenomenological researchers must make thoughtful, transparent decisions grounded in their particular methodology and study. Together, they consider the relationship between participant numbers and analytical depth, the ethical implications of collecting more experiential material than a researcher can meaningfully engage with, and whether pilot studies sit comfortably within phenomenological inquiry. They also discuss the contested place of member checking and reflect on what examiners hope to encounter when reading a phenomenological thesis. In this episode, we discuss: Why more participants do not necessarily produce better phenomenological research Balancing depth, feasibility and ethical responsibility Whether pilot studies are methodologically congruent with phenomenology The possibilities and limitations of member checking Why researchers must take ownership of their interpretations What examiners look for in a phenomenological thesis The importance of methodological coherence, accessible writing and researcher voice
How can a researcher shape a participant’s words without losing the meaning of their experience? In this episode of The Phenomenology Collective, we explore crafted stories as a creative, interpretive and philosophically grounded practice within hermeneutic phenomenology. We are joined by Professor Susan Crowther, Professor of Midwifery at Auckland University of Technology, whose work brings together phenomenology, ecological thinking and a lifelong commitment to relational care. Susan helps us consider how phenomenological researchers can move beyond simply reporting what participants say and begin to reveal meanings that may otherwise remain concealed or taken for granted. At the heart of our conversation is the crafted story: an account carefully developed from interview material through a process of dwelling, interpreting, pruning and writing. Susan also reads a crafted story from her own research, allowing us not only to discuss this form of phenomenological writing, but to experience its emotional and evocative possibilities. In this episode, we discuss: What makes hermeneutic phenomenology distinctive Moving from description towards phenomenological interpretation What crafted stories are—and what they are not The relationship between crafting, analysis and representation Voice, power, ethics and trustworthiness How rhythm, mood and reading aloud can reveal lived meaning Why phenomenological writing should speak to us emotionally as well as intellectually
What does it mean to practise transcendental (or descriptive) phenomenology? In this episode of The Phenomenology Collective, we explore how Moustakas’ transcendental phenomenology moves from philosophical ideas into the practical realities of doctoral research. We’re joined by Professional Doctorate candidate Emma Collins, who is using Moustakas’ approach to explore student nurses’ lived experiences of leadership learning. Drawing on her research journey, Emma offers an honest account of what it means to work descriptively with experience and to encounter a familiar phenomenon as if seeing it for the first time. Together, we explore the distinctive commitments of transcendental phenomenology, including epoché, phenomenological reduction, horizonalisation, imaginative variation, and the movement from individual descriptions towards a composite essence. In this episode, we discuss: What makes Moustakas’ approach transcendental and descriptive Why epoché is central—and what it looks like in practice Approaching a familiar phenomenon with openness and freshness Moving from horizons and invariant constituents to phenomenological descriptions The difference between the texture and structure of an experience Using imaginative variation to illuminate the conditions of experience Balancing individual descriptions with the search for shared meanings and essences How images can support the description of experiences that are difficult to articulate
What happens when a doctoral student chooses phenomenology, but their supervisor’s own methodological expertise lies elsewhere? In this episode of The Phenomenology Collective, we explore the possibilities—and responsibilities—of supervising phenomenological research beyond one’s principal methodological specialism. We’re joined by Professor Hilary Engward, an experienced doctoral supervisor whose own methodological background is principally in grounded theory. Hilary reflects on how supervisors can support phenomenological researchers through curiosity, critical questioning and a willingness to learn alongside the student—without pretending to possess every answer. In this episode, we discuss: Why the research question should guide the choice of methodology What it means to “stick to the methodology like glue” Balancing creativity with methodological rigour Supervising beyond your expertise Learning to think and communicate phenomenologically The importance of finding a wider phenomenological community This conversation reminds us that good supervision does not depend upon one person knowing everything. It requires intellectual humility, shared responsibility and a willingness to remain genuinely curious.
What does it mean to listen to a child who does not communicate through conventional speech? In this episode of The Phenomenology Collective, we explore how phenomenology can help us encounter experiences expressed beyond words. We’re joined by Hannah McCormack, a final-year PhD researcher at the University of Dundee whose hermeneutic phenomenological study explores the voices and lived experiences of very young children with special educational needs and disabilities. Drawing on more than 20 years in early years education, Hannah challenges the assumption that an absence of speech means an absence of voice. Together, we discuss: How gesture, movement, gaze and touch can communicate meaning The difference between hearing a child and genuinely listening Using hermeneutic phenomenology with non-verbal participants The importance of time, familiarity and attentive presence The role of parents and practitioners in interpretation Navigating consent, assent and ethical inclusion Remaining open and methodologically rigorous when conventional interviews are not possible