The One Skill Long Range Shooters Cannot Skip | Coach Glue EP34

A father drove past his daughters’ elementary school and witnessed an unfolding nightmare. When gunfire erupted at Silver Rail Elementary in Bend, Oregon, he intervened. But what happens when an armed civilian makes the decision to enter an active shooter situation? In this episode of We Da People, Shelton, Colin, and Fred examine the Oregon school shooting, the courage of an armed parent, and a teacher who fought to protect her students. They discuss how personal stakes can change the decision to act, and why a person carrying a gun may still face dangerous confusion when police arrive. The conversation shifts into the bigger gun rights and school safety debate: Should teachers be armed? Would secure firearm storage and training help? Should schools employ more armed security officers? The crew explores the risks of civilian intervention and the legal consequences that may follow. They also compare everyday carry vs. truck guns, discuss firearm storage around children, and debate accountability, prevention, and punishment for mass violence. At the center of it all is a difficult question: How do we protect children without pretending there are simple answers? In this episode we cover:What happened at Silver Rail Elementary in Bend, OregonWhy an armed father chose to interveneThe teacher whose actions helped stop the threatGood guy with a gun arguments—and their limitsArmed teachers, training, and school security Everyday carry vs. truck gun considerationsFirearm storage, parents, and responsibilityCriminal accountability and deterrence

Black Rambo has millions of followers, massive reach, and one of the most recognizable personalities in firearms content. So why does he still feel like parts of the gun industry refuse to give him his respect? In this episode of We Da People, Black Rambo sits down with Shelton, Fred, and Colin of Gunplay TV for a raw conversation about gun industry gatekeeping, creator hate, authenticity, brand relationships, and what it really takes to build an audience without changing who you are. Rambo responds directly to claims that he is “a character,” talks about being criticized for his energy and style, and explains why he believes he helped bring new people into the firearms community. He also opens up about his Marine Corps background, his first viral gun video, his early SHOT Show experience, working with firearm brands, and learning how to turn attention into opportunity. The conversation also gets into the business behind being a gun content creator. Millions of views do not always mean millions of dollars. Rambo breaks down product sales, monetization challenges, sponsorships, and why creators have to find multiple ways to make money. In this episode we cover:- Why Black Rambo gets so much criticism- Gun industry gatekeeping and changing firearm culture- His Marine Corps and Iraq War background- How one gun video changed his social media career- SHOT Show, firearm brands, and creator relationships- Why big views do not always equal big income- Building your own lane instead of asking for a seat- Staying authentic when the internet wants you to change Key takeaway: You do not have to fit the industry mold to build influence.

What does it actually mean to be a capable man, and can you be dangerous without being reckless? In this episode of We Da People, Dr. Sam joins the crew for a direct conversation about masculinity and emotional control, martial arts mindset, confidence, ego, and what happens when pressure exposes who you really are. The discussion starts with the difference between looking tough and actually having a usable skill set. The crew gets into why real capability often comes with restraint, why confidence doesn’t have to be loud, and why emotional intelligence for men matters even more when firearms, self-defense, family, and responsibility enter the picture. Then the conversation shifts to social media. Dr. Sam breaks down how he handles internet trolls without letting them pull him off center, while the crew discusses rage bait, online disrespect, groupthink, and the pressure to prove yourself to strangers. They also challenge the gap between sport martial arts and real-world self-defense, including why training has to match the environment you may actually face. In this episode we cover:• Masculinity, discipline, and emotional regulation• Confidence vs. arrogance• Martial arts mindset and pressure testing• Self-defense mindset and personal responsibility• How to deal with internet trolls• Social media rage bait and emotional triggers• Street fight vs. martial arts assumptions• Why men need people who will challenge them

Want to start hunting but feel like you need thousands of dollars in gear before you can even step into the woods? This episode of We Da People breaks down what beginner hunters actually need, what they can skip, and how to get started without overcomplicating it. Eric Morris joins the crew to walk through how to start hunting, from hunter education and getting a hunting license to choosing public land hunting versus private land hunting. He explains why new hunters should focus less on expensive equipment and more on fundamentals, experience, safety, and understanding the animal they plan to hunt. The conversation also gets into beginner hunting gear, choosing a shotgun for hunting, hog hunting, squirrel hunting, trail cameras, blaze orange requirements, scouting, scent control, wind direction, and what you should realistically carry into the woods. One of the biggest themes of this episode is simple: hunting does not have to be expensive. You don't necessarily need the newest rifle, premium camouflage, a lifted truck, or a backpack full of equipment to get started.

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial has become bigger than one courtroom. In this episode of We Da People, the crew debates the case, the lone holdout juror, postpartum psychosis, media framing, and a much harder question: does justice look different when money, resources, race, and public sympathy enter the picture? We break down the Lindsay Clancy trial from the perspective of criminal responsibility, not whether the deaths occurred. The conversation focuses on the insanity defense, the role of mental health records, access to expert witnesses, and why one juror refusing to join the majority became a national story. The crew also compares the attention around Clancy with the case of Latarsha Sanders, whose case raised its own questions about psychiatric evidence and equal treatment inside the justice system. From there, the discussion expands into media bias, the court of public opinion, online activism, and how headlines can shape what people believe before they ever examine the underlying facts. In this episode we cover: • Lindsay Clancy trial and mistrial• Postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility• The lone Black juror and the 11–1 deadlock• Lindsay Clancy vs. Latarsha Sanders• Mental health defenses and psychiatric evidence• Money, expert witnesses, and access to legal resources• Media bias and the court of public opinion• Why reading beyond the headline matters Key takeaway: the crew argues that morality, evidence, and legal standards should matter more than identity, politics, or online consensus.