Show Notes
Western ruling classes appear more interested in going after people for wrongthink and so-called hate speech than in improving their people’s material fate. Have our ruling elites perhaps started buying into their own propaganda, trapping themselves inside the echo chambers of their creation? The power elite have unmoored from reality. Barely holding on to lofty feel-good ideals of equality, safety, or diversity, they compensate for their diminishing relevance. It’s so much easier to tell a good story than to fix a real problem. It’s easier to ignore reality than to have to face it. But they’ll throw you in jail for talking back at them, or even for offering solutions. The Repression of Speech That’s what happend to the leader of the Students against Tyranny association in Norwich, UK. That young man was arrested by six police officers for calling illegal migrants possibly involved in the rape of a local teenager “foreign filth”. But if we can’t call foreign filth “foreign filth” anymore, what sort of civilization do we expect to get? Getting arrested for the wrong words has been a hallmark of Western nations’ style for certainly the larger part of the past half century. Cracking down on speech began around the same time that these Western governments felt the need to import guest workers from North Africa, and elsewhere, by the millions. And so, our own people’s fate became tied to the well-being of others, many of whom despise us, if not outright hate us. But the regime of Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer uniquely stands out. Under his two-tier policing schemes, it has been part and parcel for ordinary citizens to be sentenced to lengthy jail time, just for the crime of posting a single X tweet or Facebook post. Notably, in the wake of the Southport killings, when three girls were brutally and repeatedly stabbed by a son of African foreigners, hundreds if not thousands of Brits were fast-tracked to jail. Meanwhile, cases involving actual violence and rape, besides hurty words, are drawn out to last for over a year, such as the case of two brothers, one named Muhammad, the other Mohammed, who punched a policewoman in the face, breaking her nose. Media initially only reported on the White policeman who had to use force to restrain the attacker afterward, as though media were trying to create the British George Floyd story, before bodycam footage finally put an end to that evil, farcical twist. These British kangaroo courts befit the dealings of dictators, not democratic leaders, who, after all, were put in office by the very people now being arrested, namely for complaining about the reality of life in the United Kingdom. Last year, a woman named Lucy Connolly got about 3 years in prison for posting, “Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f*****g hotels full of the b******s for all I care... If that makes me racist, so be it.” X didn’t think the tweet was inappropriate and didn’t take it down. The British police, however, considered the message a race hate crime, despite that Lucy deleted her message within 3 hours. Connolly was kept in pre-trial detention as a way of forcing her to confess to the crime, under the false impression that a confession would get her out of prison more quickly. This is yet another token treatment of dictatorial regimes. And again, the aforementioned “Muhammed brothers” suffered no such pressure to confess. Some media are still defending them, though Connolly was universally condemned. This is what the word racism is for, but Connolly didn’t actually hate people because of their race. She hated these specific migrants, who had been in the news after the Southport riots, for potentially harboring rapists, gang rapists, thieves, and murderers among their population. The remark wasn’t meant to incriminate all innocent migrants, It was a remark targeted toward those immigrants who do show criminal tendencies. One has every right to be angered by imported crime, for there is crime, and some o
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.