Overcoming the Modern Ritual Sacrifice of the LGBT Infertility Cult [stream #88]
The Great Johannes PodcastShow Notes
Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app. A feminist woman in Mexico, Isabella Cêpa, risks being sent to jail for 25 years because she called a man a man on X. Former Mexican congressman Gabriel Quadri was equally forced to apologize every day for one month for the thought crime of pointing out that some men who disguise themselves as women had taken seats in congress reserved for biological women. He was put on a list of people who have shown aggression toward “women”. 2025 is the most Orwellian 1984. “War is peace, freedom is slavery,” and men are women. What is the purpose of this confusion, other than to allow confused men to unleash their hateful reign onto innocent civilians? Is it a justification to harm women while calling women’s defenders “misogynist”? When the sick rise to power, their first act is always to make the healthy equally sick, in order for the sick to remove their personal shame over being so abnormal. They want to make normal what can never be normal. In the West, in Europe and in the USA, we have also experienced similar cases of totalitarian abuse. Under Jack Dorsey, my then-Twitter account was suspended, because I had dared calling Lia Thomas a man. And last year, after I had argued on TikTok that young women should be given priority access to housing, so they could start having families, someone reported me to the police for “hatred of women”. Earlier this month, the University of Pennsylvania corrected the record, stating that Lia Thomas would no longer be allowed to compete against women in swimming competitions. During the last Paris Olympics that shocked the world by opening with a Satanic ritual mocking Jesus Christ’s last supper, female athletes were treated with contempt by the same people who will also jail you for calling out men dressed as women. In The Netherlands, some sanity has returned, as the Eindhoven Box Cup barred transsexual boxer Imane Khelif from participating. Khelif, who is a man, won the women’s gold medal at the Paris Olympics. We remember that the International Olympic Committee insisted, repeatedly, that Khelif was a woman, and that everyone who disagreed, again, was a woman-hater. Why is it that powerful people and authoritative organizations will rather jail people for seeing biology than to protect biological women from getting beat up by men? Who are the real women-haters here? It is the people in power who hate women. Modern Ritual Sacrifice We should praise President Donald Trump where he deserves it. Despite the Epstein scandal, under the influence of this Administration, a lot of the gender insanity has been called out and overturned. Many Western sports institutions are returning to competitive categories based on biologic sex. Even the British High Court of Justice declared earlier this year, to the apparent shock of Prime Minister Keir Starmer who kept quiet about it for five days, that a woman is indeed a biological female. There’s a catch, though, signalling the battle isn’t over, and only a small tactical victory has been won. The US Olympic and Paralympic Committee will still allow people born as women, but disguised as men, to compete against men in men’s leagues. See, the insanity is still there, though the weirdos in charge are implicitly admitting that biological women, contrary to Hollywood fiction, pose no threat to males in sports, and that there are only two sex-based sports leagues, male and female. Where are the other 65 made-up gender categories? At least for 2028, transgenders won’t be welcomed to the Olympic Games. I presume President Trump doesn’t want to come off looking like a Satanic f****t the way President Macron of France made himself out to be. Likewise, newly appointed IOC president Kristy Coventry said she wants to “protect the women’s category”, but why doesn’t she want to protect the men’s category as well? Why not completely abolish this nonsense while you had the chance? It
More from The Great Johannes Podcast
In this livestreamed discussion, I went over several concepts relating to White men as the world’s scapegoats. And that—though we cannot change the role—we can stop playing it. By focusing on what we still can do for ourselves, we win status and competence on our own terms. That is something society cannot prevent us from doing. So, we escape the scapegoat role by refusing to argue for better treatment. Instead, we start treating ourselves right.
It turns out that people’s sense of race and language develops simultaneously. Meaning, a White American child would expect other White children to speak their language. But if they meet a brown child who speak proper American English, they will prefer the brown child to another White child who can’t speak English well. Elites, therefore, united behind their shared accents and dialects, usually the language of the power elite. However, rural people cannot unite behind a single language, since they speak wildly different dialects. And so, rural resisters must unite themselves behind race and religion.
In short, Epstein was working for the Rothschilds. He was a basic occultist working for Satanists. Their goal is to use technology to erase human religiousness. The Bill Gates jibby-jab may have been an attempt to chemically erase religiosity in some people. Elites hate Christianity, especially the patriarchal branch, because it guarantees people a free will. And elites rather see people as happy servants, bred to be slaves.
Nearly every Western nation is suffering an aging population, mass immigration, political corruption, an affordable housing crisis, and an anti-White media. Diversity is called a strength, or has it really been the result of our weakness in other domains? The Western world initially believed it could relegate Chinese industry into a position of eternal supplier to our needs. Then it appeared that China might win top dog position in the economic hierarchy of national rankings. In response, Western elites decided that we needed to get India to side with the West, at all cost. But how could we convince the massive population of India to fight with us against China? This, our ruling classes believed, could be achieved through a massive transfer wealth, namely to buy loyalty. India today is the number one recipient of remittances coming out of the USA. Remember Christmas 2024 when even Elon Musk started calling white people retarded if they didn’t like the h1b visa scam that was bringing in hundreds of thousands if not millions of Indians into the USA? His concern must have been that China wasn’t going to need any more Teslas and that Tesla was going to need the Indian market to both sell Tesla cars to and to have them produced there more cheaply. Perhaps the idea was to get to China and India to compete on price for Western consumer demands. So we learned that we can never trust our billionaire overclass’ interests because their interests are global and ours are local and national. The average person living in the West does not live globally but lives nationally at best, and how many people do you know who never even leave their local neighborhood because they work and study and go out in the same nearby streets? The needs of globalism have become a threat to our national survival. We are no longer investing in rearing children of our own because our foreign policy priorities are that we first house Indian or Somali immigrants for geopolitical reasons. A part of Somalia called Somaliland, for example, is a piece of real estate necessary for the defense of international trade routes along the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. And so it seems that the Somali daycare scam in the state of Minnesota under the supervision of former vice presidential candidate Tim waltz is most definitely a dark money scheme to funnel U.S. taxpayer funds to illicit foreign organizations. Chinese strategists however foresee a totally different outcome. They believe that China will take the number one position as the world’s next only superpower. They believe that the U.S. and India will ultimately be competing against each other for second and third place positions. If this indeed were the outcome, then the USA will no longer be able to fund the defense of Israel, in which case that piece of real estate will fall into the hands of Arabs backed by China. No, I don’t support Israel or its regime. And no, I also don’t support China taking over the territory. But if China did take over the Middle East, it would then rule all international trade. And then, in such a scenario, what is to become of Europe? Already the USA seems incapable of defending Europe under its NATO pact. Of course Europe shouldn’t have to rely on defenses paid for by the USA. Europe should rather become independent. Europe, today, is importing over 60% of its energy needs from outside of the EU bloc. How can Europe ever be independent? For starters, we could reduce our surplus population. What I personally foresee is that the economic wealth of the West is going to wither away, that the Western military presence around the world will have to be largely withdrawn, and that we will once again realize that our most precious assets are our own people living on their own land. But there is a serious risk of subjugation by foreign enemies. Our land will require heavy defenses in the near future, since Europe is surrounded by its Islamic enemies and even the Russian leaders are dreaming of annexing
Thanks to TikTok’s Daniel Clark (who gets banned often), Johannes (English), and Seth. Note that Seth isn’t a member of the Vryburger Beweging, but added his comments about New Jersey and the situation in the USA. We spoke at length about the situation in South Africa, and about how to organize successfully against the “Woke Rainbow” governments. A great insight was delivered by South African Johannes, namely that “normie” White people tend to arrive at the same conclusions once they’ve had the same experiences.