
Show Notes
Our latest podcast covers the legal and practical implications of AI-enhanced cyberattacks; the EU AI Act and other relevant regulations; and the best practices for designing, managing and responding to AI-related cyber risks. Partner Christian Leuthner in Frankfurt, partner Cynthia O'Donoghue in London with counsel Asélle Ibraimova share their insights and experience from advising clients across various sectors and jurisdictions. ----more---- Transcript: Intro: Hello, and welcome to Tech Law Talks, a podcast brought to you by Reed Smith's Emerging Technologies Group. In each episode of this podcast, we will discuss cutting-edge issues on technology, data, and the law. We will provide practical observations on a wide variety of technology and data topics to give you quick and actionable tips to address the issues you are dealing with every day. Christian: Welcome to the Tech Law Talks, now new series on AI. Over the coming months, we'll explore the key challenges and opportunities within the rapidly evolving AI landscape. Today, we will focus on AI and cybersecurity threat. My name is Christian Leutner. I'm a partner at the Reed Smith Frankfurt office, and I'm with my colleagues Cynthia O'Donoghue and Asélle Ibraimova from the London office. Cynthia: Morning, Christian. Thanks. Asélle: Hi, Christian. Hi, Cynthia. Happy to be on this podcast with you. Christian: Great. In late April 2024, the German Federal Office for Information Security has identified that AI, and in particular, generative AI and large language models, LLM, is significantly lowering the barriers to entry for cyber attacks. The technology, so AI, enhances the scope, speed, and the impact of cyber attacks, of malicious activities, because it simplifies social engineering, and it really makes the creation or generation of malicious code faster, simpler, and accessible to almost everybody. The EU legislator had some attacks in mind when creating the AI Act. Cynthia, can you tell us a bit about what the EU regulator particularly saw as a threat? Cynthia: Sure, Christian. I'm going to start by saying there's a certain irony in the EU AI Act, which is that there's very little about the threat of AI, even though sprinkled throughout the EU AI Act is lots of discussion around security and keeping AI systems safe, particularly high-risk systems. But the EU AI Act contains a particular article that's focused on the design of high-risk systems and cybersecurity. And the main concern is really around the potential for data poisoning and for model poisoning. And so part of the principle behind the EU AI Act is security by design. And so the idea is that the EU AI Act regulates high-risk AI systems such that they need to be designed and developed in a way that ensures an appropriate level of accuracy robustness, and cybersecurity. And to prevent such things as data poisoning and model poisoning. And it also talks about the horizontal laws across the EU. So because the EU AI Act treats AI as a product, it brings into play other EU directives, like the Directive on the Resilience of Critical Entities and the newest cybersecurity regulation in relation to digital products. And I think when we think about AI, you know, most of our clients are concerned about the use of AI systems and being, let's say, ensuring that they're secure. But really, you know, based on that German study you mentioned at the beginning of the podcast, I think there's less attention paid to use of AI as a threat vector for cybersecurity attacks. So, Christian, what do you think is the relationship between the AI Act and the Cyber Resilience Act, for instance? Christian: Yeah, I think, and you mentioned it already. So the legislator thought there is a link and the high-risk AI models need to implement a lot of security measures. And the latest Cyber Resilience Act requires some stakeholders in software and hardware products to also implement security measures and also imposes another or l
More from Tech Law Talks
Effective AI governance starts with effective data governance. Anthony Diana, Therese Craparo, Kiriaki Tourikis, and Kristen Pologruto explore how organizations can strengthen the data foundation behind AI to improve results, manage risk, and build more defensible AI programs.
As AI becomes embedded across the enterprise, legal and compliance teams face new questions around discoverability, preservation, privilege, and the defensible use of AI in document review. Anthony Diana, Therese Craparo, and Michael Rubayo join Robert Cruz of Smarsh to discuss lessons from existing e-discovery practices and practical considerations for managing AI-generated information and emerging litigation risks.
The EU’s Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act are reshaping how technology companies operate, compete, and manage online services. In this episode, Reed Smith attorneys Natasha Tardif and Léonie Dhellemmes break down the latest enforcement actions, multimillion-euro fines, and key compliance considerations for businesses navigating Europe’s rapidly evolving digital regulatory framework.
As AI transforms communications monitoring and supervision, businesses face growing pressure to demonstrate that their compliance programs are effective, defensible, and well governed. In this episode of “Tech Law Talks,” Smarsh’s VP of Regulatory and Information Governance, Robert Cruz, joins Reed Smith lawyers Anthony Diana, Therese Craparo, and Michael Rubayo to explore evolving regulatory expectations, the shift from lexicons to AI-powered surveillance, and the ways that organizations can manage risk at a time when autonomous AI agents are becoming part of the compliance landscape.
As the use of artificial intelligence accelerates across financial services and other regulated industries, businesses are facing difficult questions about when AI outputs, chatbot exchanges, and agent activity become records that must be retained. In this episode of “Tech Law Talks," Smarsh’s Robert Cruz joins Reed Smith lawyers Anthony Diana, Therese Craparo, and Michael Rubayo as they discuss emerging regulatory expectations, governance strategies, third-party risk, and the growing compliance challenges posed by agentic AI.