Show Notes
Artificial intelligence isn’t alive. But our belief that it is may be the most dangerous illusion of all. Tech leaders talk about AI as if it thinks for itself. But that fantasy hides a more nuanced story about people, power, and profit.
In this episode of Futurology, musician and technologist Jaron Lanier joins Futurology Producer Grant Slater to explain why treating AI as a creature, rather than a tool, lets corporations own the work of millions and silence the humans behind the code. Lanier argues that every algorithm is built from borrowed human creativity — the songs, stories, and patterns we’ve already made. The way forward, he says, is to restore data dignity: valuing people for the music and meaning they create, instead of worshipping the machines that remix it.
Resources
Who Owns the Future — Jaron Lanier (Book, 2013)
The Dawn of the New Everything — Jaron Lanier (Book, 2017)
Vers la flamme — Alexander Scriabin (Solo Piano Piece, 1914)
A Blueprint for a Better Digital Society — Jaron Lanier and E. Glen Weyl (Article, 2018)
Computing Machinery and Intelligence — Alan Turing (Article, 1950)
Instruments of Change — Jaron Lanier (Album, 1994)
Fantasia — Walt Disney Productions (Film, 1940)
Snow Crash — Neal Stephenson (Novel, 1992)
Want to share suggestions or feedback?
Email [email protected]
Keep up to Date with the Berggruen Institute at:
Instagram: / berggrueninst
Twitter/X: / berggrueninst
Facebook: / berggrueninst
LinkedIn: / berggrueninst
Bluesky /futurologypod
Credits
Producers: Grant Slater, Alex Gardels, Nathalia Ramos
Associate Producer: Elissa Mardiney
Mixing & Mastering: Aaron Bastinelli
Theme Music: Marcus Bagala
Special Thanks: Heather Mason, Olivia de Rienzo, Carly Migliori, Nick Goddard
More from Futurology
Hypocrisy, the old line goes, is the tribute vice pays to virtue. For eighty years, the powerful at least bothered to pay it, citing human rights, national security, and democracy as reasons for starting wars and undercutting liberties. Now the veneers have been stripped, and the next generation is not accepting business as usual.
Machines are starting to act like humans. Does that mean they’re conscious? The problem is we haven’t been able to prove how or why humans are conscious yet either. So why would we be able to offer any answers about AI?
Democracy counts people, not plants. Humans are only a sliver of life on this planet, but today, we're the only ones who get a vote. What if we gave rights to rivers and standing to trees?
Somewhere around the Enlightenment we decided that thinking was what made us human. We built our schools, careers, and sense of worth at the altar of intelligence. Now machines are passing us on that rubric, which leaves two possibilities: we were replaceable all along, or we picked the wrong standard to live by.
Relying on machines to coordinate our lives was just one step toward decentering humanity’s role in the world. Flights, banking, trade, food production... But as we start merging our actual decision-making with digital entities, exactly which pieces of humanity are we leaving behind? And how might we bring those pieces back?