Show Notes
Thursday, June 4 — The Supreme Court is about to hand the White House a loss on birthright citizenship, and Rush argues conservatives should be glad it happened.
Rush Lindell and Reagan break down Executive Order 14160, why every lower court blocked it, and what the April 1st oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara actually revealed about the administration's legally thin domicile theory. They walk through the Fourteenth Amendment's text, the 1898 Wong Kim Ark precedent, and what Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said from the bench. Then the conversation shifts to the real question: whether a SCOTUS loss clears the runway for the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2025 — H.R. 569 and S. 304 — or whether Republicans in Congress will let those bills die in committee. Reagan draws the line between amending the INA and touching the Fourteenth Amendment, and Rush makes the case that the Court's ruling should be treated as a legislative starting gun, not a finish line.
What do you think — is Congress ready to move, or is this another moment that gets celebrated and forgotten? Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and share this with someone who needs to hear it.
📣 We Want to Hear from You!
- 📝 Submit a question
Links
Claim my Silver Offer https://go.heymato.com/rushlindell
More from The Rush Lindell Show
Thursday, October 22: The Fed is poised to sit on its hands days before the midterms, and every economist in the Reuters poll expects a December hike anyway.
On Tuesday, October 20, the ballots are in, and Rush Lindell and Reagan fight over whether early voting is a warning for Republicans or just people voting early.
Thursday, October 15: Inflation just hit 3.7 percent, and the fight is over whether to blame Trump's war or Warsh's Fed.
On Tuesday, October 13, the House map is the story: is Cook Political Report spotting a real Democratic wave, or are the pundits just stampeding together?
On Thursday, October 8, Rush Lindell and Reagan tackle the question rattling Washington: do more than 700,000 early ballots across 30 states signal real trouble for Republicans, or just a skewed sample?