From 6 Episodes to 31: What 2025 Taught Me About Training Women - Year-End Summary | Dr. Tony Boutagy
Stronger with TimeShow Notes
What started as 6 planned episodes became 31 conversations throughout 2025. This is my year-end reflection on the final five conversations - and the one consistent message that emerged from every expert.
The core message: Individual variation matters more than sex-specific protocols. Training principles apply to human physiology, not gender categories. What you do consistently shapes who you become.
Key insights from 2025: 💡 You are what you do repeatedly" - Professor Sophia Nimphius. Your training history shapes your physiology more than your sex does. 💡 Research + coaching perspectives both matter. Research shows what works on average. Coaching finds what works for you. 💡 The public message has become too complex. 80% of women aren't lifting weights, yet the advice has become increasingly segmented and contradictory. 💡 Training frequency: The pre-steroid era (1800s-1950s) used 2-3x per week full body training. Modern muscle physiology supports this approach for natural lifters. 💡 Menopause care is patient-centered. History, symptoms, and goals drive treatment decisions - not blanket "every woman should" recommendations. 💡 Low energy availability is the hidden epidemic in midlife women. Even 35-year-olds are showing perimenopausal symptoms from chronic under-fueling.
Brief highlights from 5 conversations: 🎙️ Round Table (Paul Laursen, Jake Doleschal, Dana Lis): How strength, endurance, and nutrition interact in real life. Why zones are coaching prescription tools, not gender-specific protocols. 🎙️ Jake Doleschal: Training frequency and the muscle fiber-specific nature of hypertrophy. Why first sets give you 50% of stimulus with diminishing returns after. 🎙️ Dr. Nadya Chami: What happens in a menopause consultation. Individualized hormone therapy decisions based on patient needs and contraindications. 🎙️ Professor Abbie Smith-Ryan: Context matters for fasted training. Fueling around training sessions for better body composition. Why short-term studies miss real-world complexity. 🎙️ Professor Sophia Nimphius: Research quality issues (85% of top meta-analyses contain errors). The circle of resistance training life. Why more overlap exists than difference between male and female training responses.
📅 2026 plans: Body composition focus, continued women's health and performance, and the experts doing the actual research.
If you found this valuable, follow for more evidence-based insights in 2026.
More from Stronger with Time
How many sets does a muscle need to grow, and how much does each extra set add? In this episode of Stronger With Time, I speak with Dr Jake Remmert about volume, frequency and effort, and what the research means for how you program for muscle growth. Jake is an exercise physiology professor at Illinois State University and a strength and physique coach. He did his PhD in Dr Mike Zourdos's Muscle Physiology Laboratory at Florida Atlantic University, is one of the primary authors of the recent meta regression on per session training volume, and co-authored the dose response analysis on weekly volume, frequency and proximity to failure with Josh Pelland and Zac Robinson. Throughout, Jake makes the case that the big rocks (effort, recoverable volume and consistency over time) matter more than the fine details.
Professor Roger Enoka is one of the world’s leading authorities on the neuromuscular system and has spent more than four decades studying how the nervous system produces movement, strength and fatigue. He is the author of Neuromechanics of Human Movement, now in its sixth edition. In this episode of Stronger With Time, we discuss why Type II muscle fibres are not simply high-threshold motor units, why light and heavy loads taken to failure can produce similar muscle growth despite differences in motor unit activity, and what can limit your ability to continue a set as you approach failure. In this episode, we discuss: What a motor unit is, and why muscle fibre type and recruitment threshold are not the same thing
How much of what we do in the gym today is genuinely new, and how much has been around for decades? In this episode of Stronger With Time, I speak with Dr Conor Heffernan about where many of the training ideas we now take for granted came from, how they changed over time, and what their history can teach us about how we train today. Conor is a historian and sociologist of sport at Ulster University whose work focuses on the history of strength training and physical culture. He is the author of The History of Physical Culture and When Fitness Went Global, and writes at Physical Culture Study.
VO2 max matters, but what else determines endurance, and how should you train for it?
Two people can have similar muscle mass and very different levels of strength. What accounts for the difference? In this episode of Stronger With Time, Tony speaks with Professor Paul Comfort, one of the world’s leading strength and conditioning researchers, about what influences strength beyond muscle size, and what that means for training. Paul is Professor of Strength and Conditioning at the University of Salford in the UK, where he leads the Master of Strength and Conditioning program. He also holds an adjunct professorship at Edith Cowan University in Western Australia. His research focuses on strength training, force production and the assessment of physical performance. In this episode, they discuss: How strength is assessed, and whether a true one-repetition maximum is as fatiguing as people think