Can Trump steal the midterms?

Concerns about the integrity of the voting system have intensified as the midterm elections approach, particularly in light of President Trump's ongoing rhetoric questioning the legitimacy of mail-in ballots and alleging widespread voter fraud. Trump’s administration has attempted to impose stricter regulations on mail voting and has made unsupported claims about foreign interference in elections. Despite these efforts, experts suggest that the actual risks to free and fair elections this November remain relatively low, thanks to successful legal challenges against the administration's attempts to alter election processes.

Eliza Swearenbecker, deputy director of the Voting Rights Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, emphasizes that the decentralized nature of the U.S. election system acts as a safeguard against interference. Courts have consistently ruled against the Trump administration's efforts to meddle with state election procedures, reinforcing the autonomy of local election officials. Voter confidence is crucial, and while misinformation has created some confusion, Swearenbecker encourages voters to participate actively in the electoral process, noting that turnout is the best way to counteract attempts to undermine trust in democracy.

Looking ahead to Election Day, voters are advised to familiarize themselves with their voting options, including mail-in ballots and registration status. The counting of ballots may extend beyond Election Day, which could lead to initial discrepancies in reported results. However, Swearenbecker reassures voters that every properly cast ballot will be counted, and emphasizes the importance of patience and participation in the democratic process. The conversation highlights the ongoing challenges and the need for reforms to enhance voter access and confidence in the electoral system.

Between the Trump administration’s executive orders, lawsuits, and relentless rhetoric, it feels like voting systems in America are under constant threat. Is it working?

Editor’s note: Earlier in this episode, Sweren-Becker said that 26 courts had decided that the DoJ is not entitled to voter records. Oklahoma settled its suit, and the state agreed to provide its voter data.

This show was edited by Kasia Broussalian, fact checked by Esther Gim, mixed by Shannon Mahoney, video edited by Christopher Snyder, and hosted by Astead Herndon.

Photo caption: President Donald Trump arrives for a campaign rally Wasilla, Alaska. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

You can also watch this episode on youtube.com/vox. Listen to Today, Explained ad-free by becoming a Vox Member: vox.com/members. New Vox members get $20 off their membership right now. If you enjoy our reporting and want to learn more, sign up for Astead’s weekly newsletter, Midterms, Actually. Just go to www.vox.com/midtermsactually to learn more, and get in-depth analysis about this year’s election right to your inbox.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices