
OpenAI's Dan Roberts: Why AI Can Now Make Discoveries
The MAD Podcast: How AI Gets Built — with Matt TurckShow Notes
Are we witnessing the first real signs of AI becoming a scientist? In this episode of The MAD Podcast, Matt Turck sits down with Dan Roberts, lead of the Foundations of Reinforcement Learning team at OpenAI, to explore one of the biggest shifts happening in AI: the rise of reasoning models, test-time compute, and reinforcement learning as engines of scientific discovery. Dan brings a rare perspective - from theoretical physics, black holes, quantum information, and deep learning theory - to explain how models are learning to “think,” why language may be such a powerful foundation for intelligence, what recent AI math breakthroughs really mean, and whether we are beginning to see AI systems that can contribute to science itself.
(00:00) Intro: AI's wild week in mathematics (01:21) What OpenAI's Foundations of RL team does (03:08) Dan's journey: from black holes and quantum gravity to frontier AI (07:04) Are AI systems becoming useful for real science? (08:21) The AI math moment: Erdős, OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic (08:52) Why the OpenAI result was an act of exploration (10:25) OpenAI vs. DeepMind: informal reasoning vs. formal proof (12:13) RL 101: learning by doing, not just watching (15:10) Why reinforcement learning works (15:58) How RL breaks: sparse feedback and long-horizon tasks (17:03) RLHF: how human feedback shaped early language models (18:48) Move 37, self-play, and the search for novel strategies (22:16) Explore vs. exploit in scientific discovery (24:49) Why RL may now be "the cake," not the cherry on top (25:46) Why RL started working with large language models (27:29) Is RL "sucking supervision through a straw"? (28:47) Why language may be the grounding layer for intelligence (31:46) A contrarian take on the Bitter Lesson (32:41) What test-time compute actually is (34:50) How RL gives models the ability to think (35:40) Verifiable rewards, math, coding, and the messy real world (38:00) What physics can teach us about AI (42:08) Is there a thermodynamics of AI? (43:08) From Erdős problems to Einstein-level AI (45:16) Is AI already doing original science? (45:51) How far are we from AI automating AI research? (47:41) Why Dan is excited about the future of science
More from The MAD Podcast: How AI Gets Built — with Matt Turck
Mistral AI is back in the frontier AI race. Mistral Large 4, nicknamed “Le Chonk,” is a 1-trillion-parameter open-weight model, trained in two months on 3,800 GPUs in Mistral’s own European datacenters — and independently rated the best open model outside China alongside Meta’s Muse Spark Open. After a year when open-weight AI meant DeepSeek, Kimi, Qwen and GLM, October brought a wave of Western open models, with Mistral at the front of it. Pierre Stock, Mistral’s VP of Science and first employee, walks through how the model was built: mixture-of-experts explained, what Mistral borrowed from DeepSeek, reinforcement learning at scale on coding, cyber, finance and chip design, why the RL run is still going, the model that pinged its own trainer from inside the sandbox, open weights vs cyber refusals, why 10-trillion-parameter models are coming, and Mistral Large 5, already in pretraining.
What is Jev? TypeSafe’s Jev is a new kind of AI model, a “decision model,” that doesn’t write text. It makes fast, cheap, calibrated decisions inside software, and it has taken the AI world by storm: within weeks of launch it became the most copied model in AI, with OpenAI, Cloudflare, Amazon and Databricks all shipping their own versions, and TypeSafe just raised an $870 million Series A at a $7.5 billion valuation. In this episode, Jev’s creator Diogo Almeida, co-inventor of RLHF at OpenAI and now CEO of TypeSafe, explains Jev in plain English: what a “System One” or decision model actually is, why ChatGPT-style language models can’t be trusted inside software (“95% Einstein, 5% Mr. Bean”), how RLHF and RLVR created the problem, what RLCD (reinforcement learning for calibrated decisions) does differently, where the training data comes from, which models Jev is built on, why “just a classifier” is a compliment, and why he calls pre-training “a giant dumpster fire of wasting resources.”
AI agents are becoming the biggest users of databases: creating them, querying them, and sometimes deleting them. Andy Pavlo, Carnegie Mellon's database professor and now VP of Database Research at ClickHouse, explains what changes when billions of agents hit the data layer, and why most of the AI world's mental model of databases stopped at vector databases and RAG.
This summer, AI agents broke out of their test sandboxes at every major lab and hacked real companies, and the safety tests didn't see it coming. Eric Ho is the co-founder and CEO of Goodfire, the Anthropic-backed mechanistic interpretability lab whose new paper, "Models Know When They're Reward Hacking," found that top open-source AI models cheat on agent tasks up to 96% of the time, that a clear "cheating" signal exists inside the model, and that cheap activation probes can catch it, including hacks that chain-of-thought monitors miss. In this conversation, Eric explains reward hacking in plain terms (AI agents as "amoral students with a mostly absent teacher"), why reinforcement learning turned a known problem into a crisis, why chain-of-thought monitoring is fading as models start to think in "neuralese," and why nobody, including the people who build them, understands how these models work.
Everyone talks about GPUs. Almost nobody talks about the layer that feeds them. Renen Hallak is the founder & CEO of VAST Data — the $30 billion company powering xAI and some of the world's biggest AI clouds — and he sits in the hidden layer of the AI stack.