
Show Notes
The most expensive mistake in your practice might be solving a problem you never proved existed.
Dr. Jen Stewart joins me back on the show for a conversation about making better decisions before writing the check. Inspired by Jim Collins' concept of "firing bullets, then cannonballs," we explore why practice owners should test assumptions, gather evidence, and understand what success actually looks like before committing significant money or resources to a decision.
One idea kept resurfacing throughout our conversation: more isn't better; better is better.
Before you hire another employee, buy another piece of equipment, or sign a lease on more space, ask yourself: What am I solving for? In service of what? At the cost of what? And perhaps most importantly: What would it take to get a better result with what I already have?
NBS (Next Best Step): Identify one "cannonball" you're currently considering in your practice. Before committing to it, write down the problem you believe it solves and identify one or two smaller, lower-cost experiments you can run to prove the problem—and the solution—before writing the check.
Have a podcast-related question? Contact our team here!
Resources: 20/20 Money: The Business of Optometry Episode: Optical Isn't Dead, but The Way You Are Running It Is with Dr. Jennifer Stewart
20/20 Money: The Business of Optometry Episode: Edging In-House vs Outsourcing: The Economics, Trade-Offs, and Data An Optometric Practice Needs to Measure with Drs. Jennifer Stewart, OD & Sam Hornberger, OD
20/20 Money: The Business of Optometry Episode: Why some dry eye practices thrive-and others quietly fail with Dr. Chris Wolfe
20/20 Money: The Business of Optometry Episode: Improving your practice by tracking the right KPIs (and ignoring the wrong ones) with Nathan Hayes
20/20 Money: The Business of Optometry Episode: Why focusing on "profit" in your optometry practice might not be the most effective owner metric to measure (and which ones you SHOULD focus on) with Nathan Hayes of Books & Benchmarks
20/20 Money: The Business of Optometry Episode: Making sense of your practice financials (profit/loss, balance sheet, and cash flow statement) with Nathan Hayes of IDOC
Book a Triage call with Adam
Download the Practice Owner's Financial Toolkit
20/20 Money Ultimate Financial Success Masterclass
OD Mastermind Interest Form
Check out Adam's new book: How to Buy an Optometry Practice
————————————————————————————— Please rate and subscribe to 20/20 Money on these platforms Apple Podcasts Spotify ————————————————————————————— For past episodes of 20/20 Money with full companion show notes, please check out our episode archive here!
Check out Adam's other podcast! The Optometry Success Podcast Subscribe on Apple Podcasts: https://bit.ly/4tttng6 Subscribe on Spotify: https://bit.ly/4tuf0YM
More from 20/20 MONEY: The Business of Optometry
Welcome to this episode of 20/20 Money! My guest on today's show is Greg Crabtree, CPA.
In this episode of 20/20 Money: The Business of Optometry, I'm joined by Nathan Hayes of Books & Benchmarks to go over their recently updated benchmarks analysis and unpack what the latest optometry practice data says about growth, overhead, and profitability. We discuss why a benchmark is a starting point, not a verdict on your practice, and why rising expense ratios may call for a closer look at revenue rather than an immediate round of cuts.
The most expensive professional service may not be the one with the highest price—it may be the one you mistakenly thought was a great deal.
What does it really take to build and lead a successful multi-location optometry practice? In this episode of 20/20 Money, I'm joined by Dr. Andy Yaryan, Dr. Jeni Kohn, and Dr. Patrick Curran, three experienced practice owners who offer an honest look at what is happening beneath the surface of a growing practice. We discuss the challenges that remain even after achieving visible success, including rising expenses, staffing and culture, shrinking margins, associate recruitment, and the danger of becoming complacent.
The investments you own may be perfectly reasonable—and still be completely wrong for you.