Why More Sets, More Soreness and a New Program Every Month Aren't Building More Muscle
Stronger with TimeShow Notes
How many sets should you do? How often should you train a muscle? How close to failure should you go? Before answering any of those questions, I want to know what the program is trying to achieve and what the person can recover from. In this episode of Stronger With Time, I'm resharing a conversation I had with Ariel and Matt from Raise the Bar about the way I think about exercise programming after more than 30 years of coaching and studying exercise science. We start with how I moved from endurance sport into strength and conditioning, why I have remained a student of the field, and what decades of coaching have taught me about translating research into practice. From there, we get into the programming questions that matter in the gym, including several areas where I have changed my mind. We discuss: Why the goal and the person’s ability to recover come before sets and reps
Why the first sets of an exercise appear to give the most benefit, what my new meta-analysis changed about how quickly returns diminish, and what that means for how much you do
Why strength and hypertrophy are related, but not the same adaptation
Why mechanical tension is central to muscle growth
What soreness, muscle damage and metabolic stress do, and do not, tell us about hypertrophy
Rep ranges, proximity to failure and muscle fibre recruitment
Exercise selection and why some muscles benefit from biomechanically different movements
Training frequency versus doing more volume in one session
Why I often favour total-body training two or three times per week
How I approach strength training for women who want to get stronger without maximising muscle size
How long to keep a program and why changing exercises too quickly can matter
Progressive overload, periodisation and where the evidence is still developing
Where research can guide programming and where coaching judgement still matters
Why I'd question any program that needs a deload, and what a drop in performance is actually telling you
This conversation is for coaches, trainers and serious lifters who want to make better programming decisions without reducing exercise science to a set of universal rules. I am building a short course on the science of hypertrophy: I'm building a short course on the science of hypertrophy. Over the past year I've reviewed the hypertrophy research in full and spoken with many of the researchers behind it on this podcast, and that work has changed a few things about how I program for muscle. The short course covers exactly those changes. Join the interest list to be the first to hear when it opens: https://go.tonyboutagy.com/register-you-interest-page If you want the complete foundation on program design, that is Advanced Program Mastery. After all of this work, very little in it has needed to change: https://tonyboutagy.com/advanced-program-mastery-course-page
More from Stronger with Time
How many sets does a muscle need to grow, and how much does each extra set add? In this episode of Stronger With Time, I speak with Dr Jake Remmert about volume, frequency and effort, and what the research means for how you program for muscle growth. Jake is an exercise physiology professor at Illinois State University and a strength and physique coach. He did his PhD in Dr Mike Zourdos's Muscle Physiology Laboratory at Florida Atlantic University, is one of the primary authors of the recent meta regression on per session training volume, and co-authored the dose response analysis on weekly volume, frequency and proximity to failure with Josh Pelland and Zac Robinson. Throughout, Jake makes the case that the big rocks (effort, recoverable volume and consistency over time) matter more than the fine details.
Professor Roger Enoka is one of the world’s leading authorities on the neuromuscular system and has spent more than four decades studying how the nervous system produces movement, strength and fatigue. He is the author of Neuromechanics of Human Movement, now in its sixth edition. In this episode of Stronger With Time, we discuss why Type II muscle fibres are not simply high-threshold motor units, why light and heavy loads taken to failure can produce similar muscle growth despite differences in motor unit activity, and what can limit your ability to continue a set as you approach failure. In this episode, we discuss: What a motor unit is, and why muscle fibre type and recruitment threshold are not the same thing
How much of what we do in the gym today is genuinely new, and how much has been around for decades? In this episode of Stronger With Time, I speak with Dr Conor Heffernan about where many of the training ideas we now take for granted came from, how they changed over time, and what their history can teach us about how we train today. Conor is a historian and sociologist of sport at Ulster University whose work focuses on the history of strength training and physical culture. He is the author of The History of Physical Culture and When Fitness Went Global, and writes at Physical Culture Study.
VO2 max matters, but what else determines endurance, and how should you train for it?
Two people can have similar muscle mass and very different levels of strength. What accounts for the difference? In this episode of Stronger With Time, Tony speaks with Professor Paul Comfort, one of the world’s leading strength and conditioning researchers, about what influences strength beyond muscle size, and what that means for training. Paul is Professor of Strength and Conditioning at the University of Salford in the UK, where he leads the Master of Strength and Conditioning program. He also holds an adjunct professorship at Edith Cowan University in Western Australia. His research focuses on strength training, force production and the assessment of physical performance. In this episode, they discuss: How strength is assessed, and whether a true one-repetition maximum is as fatiguing as people think