Show Notes
It’s a mistake to assume that good differentiation always means splitting students up into small groups, says Michael McDowell, an author, coach, and former teacher.
A more effective approach, he says, is to design rigorous learning routines that unite the whole class—from fast finishers to kids who need extra support—with shared strategies, structures, and thinking moves.
Think: Same surface, different deep problems, much more time in the “we do” space, and a big emphasis on high-quality classroom discussion.
In this episode of School of Practice, McDowell breaks down three low-prep differentiation strategies, explains how and when small groups fit into the picture, and makes the case for basketball over ping-pong question protocols.
Related resources:
Learn more about this episode
How to Differentiate Without Splitting Students Up
Teaching a Class With Big Ability Differences
AI Tool Demo: Differentiating Class Materials With Diffit (video)
A Starter Kit for Differentiated Instruction
4 Research-Backed Ways to Differentiate Instruction
Actionable Assessment: A Step-by-Step Guide to Responsive Teaching and Student Growth
More from School of Practice
It started with a student writing a joke on a sticky note: “I hope we have no tests this year.”
Have you ever had a lesson get derailed by a power struggle with a student? Or is there a student in your class who you got off on the wrong foot with, and you’re not sure of the best way to repair the relationship?
Did you know that drawing can be a learning superpower—even for students who claim they’re not good at it?
Everyone makes mistakes—including teachers.
Like a lot of other educators, Nicholas Ferroni is trying to find his way back to a time before technology was the default classroom mode. He thinks he was a better teacher back then—and kids acted more like kids.