Let’s Talk - Lozano Smith Podcast

E101 From Absences to Action: Attendance, Truancy, and Special Education Obligations

Let’s Talk - Lozano Smith Podcast

Show Notes

In this episode, host Sloan Simmons is joined by Lozano Smith attorneys Sarah Garcia and Karina Demirchyan to discuss why student attendance has become a critical issue for local educational agencies and how attendance concerns can evolve into legal and special education obligations. Drawing on recent legislative updates and real-world experience, the conversation highlights funding considerations, attendance terminology, notification requirements, and when chronic absenteeism may trigger child find duties and further intervention.

Show Notes & References

1:21 – Why attendance is a critical issue for Local Educational Agencies (LEAs)

1:57 – School funding and average daily membership (Senate Bill (SB) 98)

2:05 – Optional attendance recovery program (SB 153)

2:19 – New excused absences (SB 1138) (See Client News Brief 45 – October 2024)

2:51 – Truancy (AB 461) (See Client News Brief 58 – December 2025)

3:09 – Lozano Smith Podcast Episode 99: New Laws Impacting Students Heading into 2026

3:49 – Heightened attention on attendance from California Department of Education (CDE) and supporting data

6:18 – Correlation between attendance and discipline

7:51 – Legal requirements for LEAs regarding attendance

9:16 – Terminology (chronic absenteeism, truancy, habitual truancy, and chronic truancy)

14:51 – Notification requirements for truancy letters (SB 691) (See Client News Brief 45 – October 2024)

16:56 – When attendance issues become a special education issue

21:44 – Child find and evaluating absent students for special education

22:34 – Factors that LEAs should be looking for with attendance when considering referring a student for assessment

25:18 – School Attendance Review Board (SARB)

27:11 – Effective attendance and behavior interventions

28:44 – Parent training

30:56 – Cautionary tales and anecdotes from the field

For more information on the topics discussed in this podcast, please visit our website at: www.lozanosmith.com/podcast

Disclaimer: As the information contained herein is necessarily general, its application to a particular set of facts and circumstances may vary. For this reason, this podcast episode does not constitute legal advice. We recommend that you consult with your counsel prior to acting on the information contained herein.

More from Let’s Talk - Lozano Smith Podcast

Oct 20, 2026

When it comes to school and community college district projects, correctly classifying work as “maintenance” or “construction” can make or break your bidding and contracting process. In this episode, Lozano Smith attorneys Arne Sandberg and Andrea Olivarez join host Sloan Simmons to unpack the key distinctions between these two categories, how they impact contract structure and bidding requirements, and what your team needs to know about competitive thresholds and UPCCAA procedures. Whether you’re drafting a contract or preparing to go out to bid, this discussion offers essential guidance to ensure compliance and clarity.

Sep 17, 2026

In this episode, host Michelle Cannon engages with Lozano Smith Litigation Practice Group Co-Chair Sloan Simmons and Student Practice Group Co-Chair Kyle Raney to discuss the current state of the law in California under Mirabelli v. Bonta and Mahmoud v. Taylor. The discussion reviews developments and what is anticipated in the courts through the conclusion of 2026 in relation to these cases and parallel litigation, and covers best practices and policy options for school officials due to the current status of the law.

Sep 15, 2026

Public employees and officials have the right to participate in political activity, but important restrictions apply when personal advocacy intersects with public employment and agency resources. In this episode, host Michelle Cannon connects with Lozano Smith attorneys Scott Cross and Gail Zurek to discuss how public employees and officials can distinguish between permissible private political activity and conduct performed in an official capacity. The conversation explores campaign activity during work and personal time, the use of agency facilities and resources, political forums and campaign materials, and the rules governing uniforms, agency logos, and equipment. The discussion also examines how public agencies may provide neutral information about ballot measures without engaging in advocacy, along with restrictions involving campaign solicitations, political benefits, and the Levine Act.

Aug 26, 2026

California’s SB 848 introduces significant new requirements for educational agencies related to ensuring the safety of students. In this episode, host Michelle Cannon connects with Lozano Smith attorneys Carolyn Gemma and Brianna Ramos to discuss the background behind these new requirements and what educational agencies need to know as implementation continues. The conversation explores key changes, including new legal obligations regarding employment screening, comprehensive safety plans, mandated reports, and employee trainings. The discussion provides practical insights to help educational agencies understand the law’s various effective dates and take steps to maintain compliance moving forward.

Aug 11, 2026

California’s AB 126 introduces significant changes to charter school oversight and authorizer responsibilities. In this episode, host Sloan Simmons connects with Lozano Smith’s Charter Practice Group Co-Chairs, Ed Sklar and Erin Hamor, to discuss the background behind these reforms and what they mean for charter schools and authorizers. The conversation explores key changes, including expanded oversight requirements, enhanced fiscal monitoring obligations, fraud reporting responsibilities, and further clarifications to California’s Charter Schools Act. The discussion provides practical insights to help authorizers prepare through policy updates, strengthened protocols, and improved documentation practices.

See all episodes →