Summary
Andy Burnham's first budget as Prime Minister is met with mixed reactions, as it appears to be a pragmatic approach rather than a bold initiative. The budget includes a removal of the ISA cap, allowing individuals to save up to £20,000, and a slight increase in tax on savings. While some measures aim to support small businesses and promote female entrepreneurship, critics argue that the overall package lacks excitement and fails to address pressing issues such as welfare reform.
The budget also introduces a £100 payout for households in council tax bands A to D, aimed at alleviating the burden of rising energy prices. However, experts express concerns that this payment does not adequately address the needs of larger households struggling with heating costs. Additionally, the removal of standing charges on energy bills is seen as a positive step, giving consumers more control over their expenses.
The discussion shifts to the government's recent advice for citizens to prepare for emergencies, which has sparked debate about public perception and readiness for potential crises. While some argue that the government should take more responsibility for national preparedness, others believe that encouraging individuals to stockpile essential supplies is a reasonable approach. The panel emphasizes the importance of clear communication regarding the risks posed by threats such as cyber attacks and infrastructure vulnerabilities, suggesting that a lack of historical context contributes to public complacency.
As the conversation unfolds, the potential establishment of a National Resilience Corps is introduced, which could incentivize citizens to engage in civil defense roles. This initiative may resonate with younger generations seeking meaningful contributions to their communities. Overall, the budget and emergency preparedness discussions highlight the complexities of governance in a time of uncertainty and the challenges of fostering a proactive public mindset.
Show Notes
Have YOU done YOUR emergency stash of sardines, toilet paper and Kit-Kats? The government’s warnings to stockpile tinned food and water set off a mix of panic, confusion and (from the usual suspects) mockery… but should we all be taking preparedness more seriously? Is Britain going to have to accept bigger changes in our society as the world gets more dangerous?
Plus: We look into what the “fiscal devolution” and a hundred quid off energy bills in John Healey’s first Budget all mean. It was boring, but is boring good in these straitened times? And in the Extra Bit for Patreon people, take your mind off the misery with the Oh God, What Now? winter break guide, as the panel shares some unexpectedly delightful destinations for an autumn escape.
• Questions for But Your Emails? Thoughts? Comments? Email us at [email protected].
ESCAPE ROUTES
• Jonn watched The Lion in Winter – “like Succession with Henry II”
• Hannah watched Steven Knight’s Oasis: Don’t Look Back in Anger
• Rachel has been reading Anthony Horowitz’s latest book, A Deadly Episode
• Ros has been bingeing Polish thriller The Mire on Netflix
• Support us on Patreon for the Extra Bit, ad-free episodes and more.
Presented by Ros Taylor with Hannah Fearn, Rachel Cunliffe and Jonn Elledge. Produced by James Liddell. Audio Production by Simon Williams. Art direction: James Parrett. Theme tune by Tom Taylor and Simon Williams. Managing Editor: Jacob Jarvis. Group Editor Andrew Harrison. OH GOD, WHAT NOW? is a Podmasters production.
www.podmasters.co.uk Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
More from Oh God, What Now?
Fast reaction to the Budget with Jonathan Portes, King’s College London economics and public policy professor… It was billed as the “boring” Budget, and to be fair Chancellor John Healey mostly delivered – with a few surprises. It was good news for pensioners, motorists and first-time buyers. Banks, meanwhile, were furious about a temporary tax hike, calling it “end of Rome levels of stupidity”. So what did the Chancellor actually announce? And what does it mean for YOU?
Like the Democrats we’ve been pinning our hopes on the 2026 US mid-terms to end (or at least interrupt) Trump’s cruel circus… and now they’re finally here. Will the Republicans get the devastating punishment they deserve when America votes on Tue 3 Nov? Are the Democrats now so traumatised by poll upsets that they’re imagining a defeat into existence? And what happens after – if! – the Democrats take both Houses? Congressional staffer turned politics professor at George Washington University Casey Burgat joins us to explain what it all means.
Who ordered the heated debate about Englishness? Open any newspaper or social media feed and you’ll stumble on some histrionic handwringing about “what it means it be English”. Who decided we needed to talk about this, all the time? And how thin is the cover it provides for your good old actual homegrown racism? We debate the debates in a conversation which contains cricket, Suella Braverman, Paddington, an “orchestra of dogwhistles”, Norman Tebbit, GB News’s “British-only radio station”, and surprising revelations about both of Seth’s grand-dads. Guaranteed relevant to Scottish, Irish and Welsh listeners too, honest.
Rupert Lowe of Restore UK claims that street violence is not just inevitable but necessary “if we are to save our home”. Elsewhere, the far-right pals up with street thugs – and its leaders walk right up to the line of endorsing extra-legal direct action because democracy has supposedly failed. Is the rising tide of violent rhetoric spilling over into actual physical attacks? We talk about why politics is sounding increasingly violent – and how it’s not just on the far-right. Plus: Trump’s betrayal of Ukraine sinks deeper into perfidy, can Burnham ban loudcasting on public transport, and why we should send squirrels to the White House.
• This edition recorded before Trump cancelled livestreaming the execution of the Fort Hood killer.