Show Notes
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case North Carolina v. Butler.
A man is arrested by the FBI, who gave him both a verbal and written notification of his rights. WB refused to sign a form indicating that he wished to waive his rights. Statements to the agents were included in evidence against him at trial. He was convicted, the North Carolina Supreme Court overturned the conviction, and the State cried foul.
The question before the court: can a suspect's statements be used against him if he did not explicitly say he was waiving his Miranda rights?
---
For complete episode information, check out our episode guide on our website at https://relitigated.com/2025/07/23/14-north-carolina-v-butler.
More from Relitigated
In the season 2 finale we re-argue the Supreme Court case McCleskey v. Kemp.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier.
In this special episode we bring you the first ever edition of Objection! The Relitigated Game Show.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Griggs v. Duke Power Company.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Watts v. U.S.