Summary
The discussion centers on the contentious nature of beauty in architecture and art, challenging the notion that beauty is purely subjective. The argument posits that while individual tastes may vary, there are universally recognized standards of beauty that can be agreed upon, much like consensus in other societal issues. The speaker emphasizes that some structures and places are objectively more appealing than others, as evidenced by public interest and tourism.
The conversation critiques the idea that beauty is entirely relative, suggesting that this belief serves the interests of property developers who benefit from a lack of public confidence in aesthetic judgment. By undermining the concept of objective beauty, developers can alter urban landscapes without accountability, leading to environments that many find unattractive. The speaker calls for a collective acknowledgment of beauty to prevent exploitation and promote the preservation of aesthetically pleasing spaces.
Show Notes
We often end discussions about what’s beautiful in architecture by shrugging our shoulders and saying: ‘Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.’ This is an extremely dangerous and ultimately unfounded conception.
Enjoying our Youtube videos? Get full access to all our audio content, videos, and thousands of thought-provoking articles, conversation cards and more with The School of Life Subscription: https://t.ly/pOPel
Be more mindful, present and inspired. Get the best of The School of Life delivered straight to your inbox: https://t.ly/ujf-a
SOCIAL MEDIA
Feel free to follow us at the links below:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theschooloflifelondon/
X: https://twitter.com/TheSchoolOfLife
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theschooloflifelondon/
CREDITS
Brought to you by http://www.theschooloflife.com
Produced in collaboration with Jamie Kendall http://www.jamiekendall.com #TheSchoolOfLife
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
More from The School of Life
Wu Wei is a key concept within Daoism – and refers to a serene acceptance of events. It’s a wisdom we’re very uninclined to remember in our own times.
We might think back to our pasts and give our carers a score out of ten to measure how things went. It isn’t unfair or mean sometimes - in the privacy of our own minds - to hold people to account. Finish the sentence, "My Parent made me' below and give each a score out of 10.
One of the most provocative analyses of love ever produced is to be found in the writings of the Danish Existential philosopher Soren Kierkegaard. In a book entitled Works of Love, he proposed a theory which deliberately upset every leading idea that his own age liked to entertain about this hallowed concept.
In the modern world, being in love with someone is always connected up with the idea of having (or wanting to have) sex with them eventually. The Troubadours of 11th century Provence, influenced by Plato, had a very different idea: for them love was independent of sex or indeed marriage.
Enjoying our Youtube videos? Get full access to all our audio content, videos, and thousands of thought-provoking articles, conversation cards and more with The School of Life Subscription: https://www.theschooloflife.com/the-school-of-life-youtube/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=A%20Guide%20For%20the%20Recovering%20Avoidant