Episode 2: Recent arson case shows standard of proof required to decline insurance cover
The Legal DriveShow Notes
A recent arson decision involving arson confirms the standard of proof for "serious cases" involving fraudulent conduct is on the balance of probabilities. Brought to you by nzinsurancelaw and New Zealand lawyer Steve Keall.
More from The Legal Drive
A discussion about the effect of the Corona Virus on supply contracts and legal obligations --New Zealand, February 2020. By Steve Keall, barrister.
A very brief review of some of the basics of how GST should be treated in a civil claim, in light of a recent case: Dodds v Southern Response (2019).
An analysis of the NZ Court of Appeal's decision in Avonside Holdings Ltd v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2014] NZCA 483.
A review of the recent NZ High Court decision Holler & Rouse v Osaki [2014] NZHC 1977 (20 August 2014, Justice Keane).
Changes to the barrister intervention rule in NZ are imminent.