Show Notes
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio.
One evening, police arrived at the home of DM and demanded to be let in to conduct a search. After calling her lawyer, DM declined to allow police to enter her home without a search warrant. Police eventually broke down her door and searched her home despite not having a search warrant. DM was later tried and convicted for possession of obscene material. She appealed her conviction.
The question before the court: are state courts subject to the same constitutional requirements as the federal courts?
This is episode 3 of a 3-part series on the development of the Exclusionary Rule.
More from Relitigated
In the season 2 finale we re-argue the Supreme Court case McCleskey v. Kemp.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier.
In this special episode we bring you the first ever edition of Objection! The Relitigated Game Show.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Griggs v. Duke Power Company.
In this episode we re-argue the Supreme Court case Watts v. U.S.