Karmelo Anthony Scores "Small Victory" — Judge Removed in New Trial Fight
Crime Talk with Scott ReischShow Notes
Karmelo Anthony has scored a significant procedural victory in his fight for a new trial. The Texas judge who presided over Anthony's murder trial, State District Judge John Roach Jr., has been recused from the case after Anthony's new legal team argued that Roach's post-trial comments and other actions raised questions about whether he could fairly consider allegations that serious mistakes occurred during the original trial. Visiting Judge Sid Harle granted the recusal Wednesday, and Judge Michael B. Chitty has now been assigned to the case. Anthony, now 19, was convicted in June of murdering 17-year-old Austin Metcalf during a confrontation at a high-school track meet in Frisco, Texas. Jurors rejected Anthony's self-defense argument, and he was sentenced to 35 years in prison. Anthony's new attorneys are now asking for the entire conviction to be set aside and a new trial granted. Among their arguments are allegations involving restrictions on public and media access to the courtroom, rulings affecting Anthony's defense, and disputes surrounding what evidence could be presented to jurors. The defense also focused heavily on a television interview Roach gave shortly after the verdict in which he defended the trial and indicated agreement with the jury's decision. But this is an important distinction: Karmelo Anthony has NOT been granted a new trial. His murder conviction and 35-year sentence remain in place. What he has won is the first major battle in his post-trial challenge: the judge deciding whether serious errors occurred during John Roach's trial will no longer be John Roach himself. Scott Reisch breaks down what the judge's removal means, the arguments Anthony's attorneys are making, and whether any of them could actually be enough to get Karmelo Anthony back in front of another jury. What do you think? Was removing Judge Roach the right decision — and does Anthony have a legitimate argument for a new trial? 🛍️ CRIME TALK SHOP & PARTNERS Crime Talk Store: https://crimetalknetwork.com/shop/ Run a Background Check: https://crimetalksearch.com Emergency Food Supply: https://www.rqzttm8trk.com/3Z38RPR/S5HJNJ/ Amazon Favorites: https://www.amazon.com/shop/crimetalk 🛡️ OFFICIAL DISCOUNT CODES Police Magnum — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off Invisawear Jewelry — use code CRIMETALK for 10% off Baked in Colorado — 40% off Pet CBD: https://bakedincolorado.com 🤝 JOIN THE COMMUNITY Patreon (exclusive content): https://www.patreon.com/crimetalk Official site: https://scottreisch.com X (Twitter): @CrimeTalkPod Instagram / TikTok: @CrimeTalkWithScottReisch Miss Winnie (IG/TikTok): @MissWinnieTheBulldog LEGAL VAULT Fair Use: Clips may be used for commentary, criticism, and educational purposes (see Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) and Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)). Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. I'm a lawyer — but I'm not your lawyer. Nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship. Business inquiries: [email protected] 1490 West 121st Ave., Suite 202, Denver, CO 80234 #TrueCrime
More from Crime Talk with Scott Reisch
Nick Reiner is accused of murdering his parents, Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner. Now he is asking the court for access to trust money he says was already supposed to be distributed to him years ago. The legal fight is a fascinating one. Can someone accused of killing the people who created the trust still demand that money for his defense? Reiner's attorneys say the money was already his and that he is still presumed innocent. Trustees and opposing parties point to the law designed to prevent killers from profiting from their victims. Today, we break down the trust dispute, the defense argument, the prosecution angle, and why this financial fight could shape the entire murder case going forward. #CrimeTalk #NickReiner #TrueCrime #RobReiner
Lindsay Clancy's defense suffers a major setback as the judge refuses to investigate the lone holdout juror — but the double-jeopardy fight is far from over. Plus Christa Pike, an alleged deliberate family crash, a disturbing road-rage murder, a DNA cold-case breakthrough and today's Dumb Criminal.
A father is on trial over the death of 7-year-old Ethan Hauschultz. Prosecutors say Timothy Hauschultz created the punishment that required Ethan to carry a 44.4-pound log and then left his 14-year-old son Damian in charge. Damian later admitted hitting and kicking Ethan and covering him with snow. He pleaded guilty to reckless homicide. Now the jury has to decide whether Timothy can also be held criminally responsible. Also today: Nick Reiner is back in court as both sides fight to keep grand jury transcripts sealed. Idaho prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Andrea Shaw in the deaths of her 18-month-old twin sons. A Florida police officer is accused of using information from a welfare check to take over a dead man's house. A Virginia husband allegedly tapes his wife to a chair and leaves her in the basement. And new developments in the Cornell 7 case put more pressure on Cornell University's leadership. Plus Legal History, the Legal Quote of the Day, and today's Dumb Criminal. Crime Talk with Scott Reisch. All defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.
More than three decades after the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, newly revealed records are raising questions about the missing murder weapon and whether someone may have helped O.J. Simpson dispose of evidence. Scott Reisch breaks down what the records actually show and the credibility questions surrounding the allegations. Also today: Bryan Kohberger's latest fight involving Judge Steven Hippler, the Jasmine Gill murder case, a David Prevatte retrial development, Lee Gilley's extradition battle, a Florida store owner charged with murder, Legal History, the Legal Quote of the Day and today's Dumb Criminal. Crime Talk Live tonight at 5:30 PM Mountain Time.
New questions are surrounding the Cornell 7 controversy after recordings reportedly captured a longtime fraternity adviser claiming he had connections inside Cornell University Police and could call in "favors." The recordings involve a different Cornell fraternity and do not establish that police protected the men accused in the Cornell 7 lawsuit, but they arrive while Cornell's handling of sexual misconduct allegations is already under intense scrutiny. Also on today's Crime Talk: • D4vd returns to court in the Celeste Rivas murder case • Christa Pike's attorneys seek additional time following Tennessee's failed execution attempt • Sean "Diddy" Combs is transferred to another federal prison • FBI testimony continues in the Sandra Birchmore murder trial • A Missouri fence dispute allegedly ends with a "3, 2, 1" countdown and gunfire • Dumb Criminal: 30–40 beers and a stolen Las Vegas flamingo All defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.